GMATGuruNY wrote:Let's move the events to the present tense:
The announcement says that growth accelerates after slowing in the second quarter.
While the statement above might appear as a newspaper headline, it makes no sense and is grammatically incorrect. Clearly the two actions -- the saying and the accelerating -- are not happening at the same time. Thus, the verbs should not be in the same tense:
The announcement says that growth accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.
Ah, much better. Now the order of the actions is clear and makes sense.
When the time frame moves into the past, the same logic holds true. Since the two actions are not happening at the same time, different tenses are needed. The present tense verb says becomes the past tense verb said; the past tense verb accelerated becomes the past perfect tense verb had accelerated:
The announcement said that growth had accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.
Hope this helps!
Need help on this parallelism question
-
Night reader
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:29 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:10 members
very convoluted SC entry --> after its (pointing to the growth) initial slowing OR after it had slowed initially at least; we have not additional time indication, hence the 2nd quarter term is not too much help.
-
manjus_mailme
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:24 pm
Thanks for your explanation.Now I am clear about the answer choice.GMATGuruNY wrote:Let's move the events to the present tense:
The announcement says that growth accelerates after slowing in the second quarter.
While the statement above might appear as a newspaper headline, it makes no sense and is grammatically incorrect. Clearly the two actions -- the saying and the accelerating -- are not happening at the same time. Thus, the verbs should not be in the same tense:
The announcement says that growth accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.
Ah, much better. Now the order of the actions is clear and makes sense.
When the time frame moves into the past, the same logic holds true. Since the two actions are not happening at the same time, different tenses are needed. The present tense verb says becomes the past tense verb said; the past tense verb accelerated becomes the past perfect tense verb had accelerated:
The announcement said that growth had accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.
Hope this helps!
-
crackthegmat2011
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:09 am
- Thanked: 1 times
The original sentence posted by "manjus_mailme" says "remain concerned" and not "remained concerned".
Is A still the correct answer choice ?
Is A still the correct answer choice ?
- msrrautela
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 8:05 am
- Thanked: 1 times
Great insights! Thanks a lot!GMATGuruNY wrote:Let's move the events to the present tense:
The announcement says that growth accelerates after slowing in the second quarter.
While the statement above might appear as a newspaper headline, it makes no sense and is grammatically incorrect. Clearly the two actions -- the saying and the accelerating -- are not happening at the same time. Thus, the verbs should not be in the same tense:
The announcement says that growth accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.
Ah, much better. Now the order of the actions is clear and makes sense.
When the time frame moves into the past, the same logic holds true. Since the two actions are not happening at the same time, different tenses are needed. The present tense verb says becomes the past tense verb said; the past tense verb accelerated becomes the past perfect tense verb had accelerated:
The announcement said that growth had accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.
Hope this helps!
It's a dawg eat dawg world!
-
Night reader
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:29 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:10 members
who cares OA is A!crackthegmat2011 wrote:The original sentence posted by "manjus_mailme" says "remain concerned" and not "remained concerned".
Is A still the correct answer choice ?
-
zaarathelab
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:39 pm
- Thanked: 7 times
- Followed by:1 members
GMATGURUNY, is HAD used only for the earliest event or can it be used to describe intermediary events as well ?
Also, shouldn't slowing be 'HAD SLOWED' since it is earlier than the 'HAD ACCELERATED' event?
Can we use it this way -
....... said that growth had accelerated after it had slowed....??
Pls clarify
Thanks
Also, shouldn't slowing be 'HAD SLOWED' since it is earlier than the 'HAD ACCELERATED' event?
Can we use it this way -
....... said that growth had accelerated after it had slowed....??
Pls clarify
Thanks
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
No. We cannot use the past perfect (had slowed) to express an action completed before another past perfect event (had accelerated).zaarathelab wrote:GMATGURUNY, is HAD used only for the earliest event or can it be used to describe intermediary events as well ?
Also, shouldn't slowing be 'HAD SLOWED' since it is earlier than the 'HAD ACCELERATED' event?
Can we use it this way -
....... said that growth had accelerated after it had slowed....??
Pls clarify
Thanks
To bypass the tense issue, the sentence says that growth had accelerated AFTER SLOWING. Because slowing is a gerund -- a verb functioning as a noun -- we don't have to worry about tense. The preposition after makes it clear that had accelerated took place AFTER slowing.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
killer1387
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:53 am
- Thanked: 52 times
- Followed by:5 members
hey Mitch,GMATGuruNY wrote:No. We cannot use the past perfect (had slowed) to express an action completed before another past perfect event (had accelerated).zaarathelab wrote:GMATGURUNY, is HAD used only for the earliest event or can it be used to describe intermediary events as well ?
Also, shouldn't slowing be 'HAD SLOWED' since it is earlier than the 'HAD ACCELERATED' event?
Can we use it this way -
....... said that growth had accelerated after it had slowed....??
Pls clarify
Thanks
To bypass the tense issue, the sentence says that growth had accelerated AFTER SLOWING. Because slowing is a gerund -- a verb functioning as a noun -- we don't have to worry about tense. The preposition after makes it clear that had accelerated took place AFTER slowing.
does this all discussion means that whenever we have to report sumthing such as " the editorial informed(past ) that blah blah (past perfect)...."
I am getting confused after dis SC question that the tense order needs to be maintained in these cases.
Please clarify












