BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Need help on this parallelism question

Expert replies

by Night reader » Wed Feb 02, 2011 7:38 am
very convoluted SC entry --> after its (pointing to the growth) initial slowing OR after it had slowed initially at least; we have not additional time indication, hence the 2nd quarter term is not too much help.
GMATGuruNY wrote:Let's move the events to the present tense:

The announcement says that growth accelerates after slowing in the second quarter.

While the statement above might appear as a newspaper headline, it makes no sense and is grammatically incorrect. Clearly the two actions -- the saying and the accelerating -- are not happening at the same time. Thus, the verbs should not be in the same tense:

The announcement says that growth accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.

Ah, much better. Now the order of the actions is clear and makes sense.

When the time frame moves into the past, the same logic holds true. Since the two actions are not happening at the same time, different tenses are needed. The present tense verb says becomes the past tense verb said; the past tense verb accelerated becomes the past perfect tense verb had accelerated:

The announcement said that growth had accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.

Hope this helps!
Join the discussion

by manjus_mailme » Wed Feb 02, 2011 8:20 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:Let's move the events to the present tense:

The announcement says that growth accelerates after slowing in the second quarter.

While the statement above might appear as a newspaper headline, it makes no sense and is grammatically incorrect. Clearly the two actions -- the saying and the accelerating -- are not happening at the same time. Thus, the verbs should not be in the same tense:

The announcement says that growth accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.

Ah, much better. Now the order of the actions is clear and makes sense.

When the time frame moves into the past, the same logic holds true. Since the two actions are not happening at the same time, different tenses are needed. The present tense verb says becomes the past tense verb said; the past tense verb accelerated becomes the past perfect tense verb had accelerated:

The announcement said that growth had accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.

Hope this helps!
Thanks for your explanation.Now I am clear about the answer choice.
Join the discussion

by crackthegmat2011 » Wed Feb 02, 2011 8:52 am
The original sentence posted by "manjus_mailme" says "remain concerned" and not "remained concerned".

Is A still the correct answer choice ?
Join the discussion

by msrrautela » Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:00 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:Let's move the events to the present tense:

The announcement says that growth accelerates after slowing in the second quarter.

While the statement above might appear as a newspaper headline, it makes no sense and is grammatically incorrect. Clearly the two actions -- the saying and the accelerating -- are not happening at the same time. Thus, the verbs should not be in the same tense:

The announcement says that growth accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.

Ah, much better. Now the order of the actions is clear and makes sense.

When the time frame moves into the past, the same logic holds true. Since the two actions are not happening at the same time, different tenses are needed. The present tense verb says becomes the past tense verb said; the past tense verb accelerated becomes the past perfect tense verb had accelerated:

The announcement said that growth had accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.

Hope this helps!
Great insights! Thanks a lot! :)
It's a dawg eat dawg world!
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:54 am
crackthegmat2011 wrote:The original sentence posted by "manjus_mailme" says "remain concerned" and not "remained concerned".

Is A still the correct answer choice ?
who cares OA is A!
Join the discussion

by zaarathelab » Sun Aug 07, 2011 1:00 am
GMATGURUNY, is HAD used only for the earliest event or can it be used to describe intermediary events as well ?

Also, shouldn't slowing be 'HAD SLOWED' since it is earlier than the 'HAD ACCELERATED' event?

Can we use it this way -

....... said that growth had accelerated after it had slowed....??

Pls clarify

Thanks
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Aug 07, 2011 3:40 am
zaarathelab wrote:GMATGURUNY, is HAD used only for the earliest event or can it be used to describe intermediary events as well ?

Also, shouldn't slowing be 'HAD SLOWED' since it is earlier than the 'HAD ACCELERATED' event?

Can we use it this way -

....... said that growth had accelerated after it had slowed....??

Pls clarify

Thanks
No. We cannot use the past perfect (had slowed) to express an action completed before another past perfect event (had accelerated).

To bypass the tense issue, the sentence says that growth had accelerated AFTER SLOWING. Because slowing is a gerund -- a verb functioning as a noun -- we don't have to worry about tense. The preposition after makes it clear that had accelerated took place AFTER slowing.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by killer1387 » Fri Aug 19, 2011 2:30 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
zaarathelab wrote:GMATGURUNY, is HAD used only for the earliest event or can it be used to describe intermediary events as well ?

Also, shouldn't slowing be 'HAD SLOWED' since it is earlier than the 'HAD ACCELERATED' event?

Can we use it this way -

....... said that growth had accelerated after it had slowed....??

Pls clarify

Thanks
No. We cannot use the past perfect (had slowed) to express an action completed before another past perfect event (had accelerated).

To bypass the tense issue, the sentence says that growth had accelerated AFTER SLOWING. Because slowing is a gerund -- a verb functioning as a noun -- we don't have to worry about tense. The preposition after makes it clear that had accelerated took place AFTER slowing.
hey Mitch,
does this all discussion means that whenever we have to report sumthing such as " the editorial informed(past ) that blah blah (past perfect)...."
I am getting confused after dis SC question that the tense order needs to be maintained in these cases.

Please clarify
Join the discussion