I actually have a different experience--I thought that PR produced scores that were fairly close to GMATPrep. Not as familiar with MGMAT practice tests though...lanter1 wrote:I have scored from 650 to 720 on PR and 720 on my first GMATPREP. I don't think PR is very accurate. I had one quant section where I missed 3 questions and scored a 42. In that section I got 2 out of 3 probability questions correct.
Both MGMAT tests have been 690. Missed the first question on a quant section and scored 42, but scored 45 on the second.
However, I feel the quant is relatively easier. Also, the test never seemed to get any harder as the it progresses even if you are answering the questions correctly. Was your experience any different? 
I couldn't agree more with this. I took an MGMAT test one weekend and felt quite surprised by the difficulty of the math section. I ended up getting a 45 on quant and felt pretty good about it considering that I felt like I was running out of time on most questions. The next weekend, I took my 2nd GMAT Prep test and felt exactly opposite. All the questions seemed so easy that I thought I was bombing. In fact, I scored a 49 in quant. I would highly recommend working with MGMAT - you'll feel very good about your skills when you're done with it.Krazie85 wrote:my opinion on mgmat is that the verbal is spot on to the real test. You can expect to get what you have been scoring on those verbals. The quant is harder on mgmat but if you get through a couple of their quant sections on their practice tests, the gmat quant will be much less stressful and time consuming. One time i had to guess on like 5 mgmat quants and on the real gmat I had like 5 mins left in quant when i ended.
