BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Need expert help - Assumption

Expert replies
by voodoo_child » Tue Jul 17, 2012 9:17 am
Journalist: Workers at Facsum Inc. have threatened to strike if management does not meet their demands for an immediate 5% pay raise and a paid lunch break. Further, workers are insisting that the company rehire 12 employees who were laid off for complaining about substandard wages and working conditions. It is well-known that Facsum reported that negative profits in 3 of its previous 4 quarterly earnings reports. We believe a strike is inevitable.

Identify an assumption required by the journalist's argument


The workers would likely be willing to compromise with respect to the paid lunch break.
Facsum is unwilling to negotiate with the workers.
The majority of the losses were due to a significant decline in profit margins.
The 12 laid-off employees were not laid off for any performance-related reasons.
Facsum likely does not have sufficient cash flow or cash reserves to support increased expenses.

OA - E.

Can someone explain why B) is incorrect?

Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by eagleeye » Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:12 am
voodoo_child wrote:Journalist: Workers at Facsum Inc. have threatened to strike if management does not meet their demands for an immediate 5% pay raise and a paid lunch break. Further, workers are insisting that the company rehire 12 employees who were laid off for complaining about substandard wages and working conditions. It is well-known that Facsum reported that negative profits in 3 of its previous 4 quarterly earnings reports. We believe a strike is inevitable.

Identify an assumption required by the journalist's argument


The workers would likely be willing to compromise with respect to the paid lunch break.
Facsum is unwilling to negotiate with the workers.
The majority of the losses were due to a significant decline in profit margins.
The 12 laid-off employees were not laid off for any performance-related reasons.
Facsum likely does not have sufficient cash flow or cash reserves to support increased expenses.

OA - E.

Can someone explain why B) is incorrect?

Thanks
B is incorrect because nowhere in the passage is it suggested that Facsum is "unwilling" to negotiate. We know that workers demands are not being met at the moment; however, that does not mean that Facsum are not willing to negotiate. They may be or they may not be. We just don't know. Hence B is not a required assumption.

Cheers!
Join the discussion

by Shalini Suresh » Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:22 am
Since the journalist has mentioned 'It is well-known that Facsum reported that negative profits in 3 of its previous 4 quarterly earnings reports' its safe to assume that Facsum is cash strapped and thats why they wouldnt be able to meet the workers' demands. So E) would be correct.
Join the discussion

by venmic » Thu Jul 19, 2012 7:16 pm
Factors or issues can never be an assumption

B sounds more like a possibility
Join the discussion

by faltuhaiye11 » Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:53 am
please provide the source of this question ..
"D" day matter .. not Mocks...
GPREP1- 740 ; GPREP2 700 ;
MGMAT 1:650 ; MGMAT 2 :700
MGMAT 3 :710 ; MGMAT 4 :720
MGMAT 5 :730 ; MGMAT 6 :730
D day - 680
Join the discussion

by vbalhara » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:26 am
Assumptions are of 2 types
1) protect the conclusion
2) link the related premises to form a good conclusion .

This example deals with 2 category.

B and E are the only relevant choice.


Conclusion workers will go on strike (they are demanding hike)

What can connect strike with demand? - Money :)




When left with 2 choices .. Negate each of them and see which weakens the conclusion strongly.


Company is willing to negotiate. -- Impact on conclusion -> MILD (worker may go with strike)
Company have money -- Impact on conclusion greater than above
Join the discussion

by hjafferi » Tue Aug 21, 2012 7:25 am
Got this wrong...chose D instead of E

Thanks vbalhara for the clarification
Join the discussion

by 7777 » Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:03 pm
eagleeye wrote:
voodoo_child wrote:Journalist: Workers at Facsum Inc. have threatened to strike if management does not meet their demands for an immediate 5% pay raise and a paid lunch break. Further, workers are insisting that the company rehire 12 employees who were laid off for complaining about substandard wages and working conditions. It is well-known that Facsum reported that negative profits in 3 of its previous 4 quarterly earnings reports. We believe a strike is inevitable.

Identify an assumption required by the journalist's argument


The workers would likely be willing to compromise with respect to the paid lunch break.
Facsum is unwilling to negotiate with the workers.
The majority of the losses were due to a significant decline in profit margins.
The 12 laid-off employees were not laid off for any performance-related reasons.
Facsum likely does not have sufficient cash flow or cash reserves to support increased expenses.

OA - E.

Can someone explain why B) is incorrect?

Thanks
B is incorrect because nowhere in the passage is it suggested that Facsum is "unwilling" to negotiate. We know that workers demands are not being met at the moment; however, that does not mean that Facsum are not willing to negotiate. They may be or they may not be. We just don't know. Hence B is not a required assumption.

Cheers!
negotiation is successful when both the parties are willing to negotiate. what if workers dont want to negotiate. this can't be an assumption.
negating the sentence makes it " facsum is willing to negotiate." so what?? it doesnt undermine the conclusion that strike is inevitable.
Join the discussion