BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Featured Course
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
LSAT CR
Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning |
It is an inference problem, not a support problem.selango wrote:Distance travelled and size of the group is related to Diet.Diet depends upon size of teeth and face.
so distance and size is related to size of teeth and face.
Only option E supports that.
How the statement supports (Inference) that -> animal is likely to be a herd animal.
IMO E.
A. defined the new relations(meat->small ranges and small groups) that are not stated in argument.
B. states new information about varied diets vs. one or two diets.
C. again new relationship so irrelevant.
D. from size and shape of face, species are not identified -> not mentioned in the argument.
E. quite possibly related to the information mentioned in the argument.
A. defined the new relations(meat->small ranges and small groups) that are not stated in argument.
B. states new information about varied diets vs. one or two diets.
C. again new relationship so irrelevant.
D. from size and shape of face, species are not identified -> not mentioned in the argument.
E. quite possibly related to the information mentioned in the argument.
with all the other answers falling into the category of "could" be true, only E can be right.
A) no such reference to the type of food that animals eat.
B) size? open to possibility.
C) where they travel in the pack is also open for wide range of possibility.
D) words are too strong, "all that is needed".
I guess I don't even care what E says =)
but "is likely" usually makes good candidate.
A) no such reference to the type of food that animals eat.
B) size? open to possibility.
C) where they travel in the pack is also open for wide range of possibility.
D) words are too strong, "all that is needed".
I guess I don't even care what E says =)
but "is likely" usually makes good candidate.
---> good reasoning . but except E, C also has the word likely.uwhusky wrote:with all the other answers falling into the category of "could" be true, only E can be right.
A) no such reference to the type of food that animals eat.
B) size? open to possibility.
C) where they travel in the pack is also open for wide range of possibility.
D) words are too strong, "all that is needed".
I guess I don't even care what E says =)
but "is likely" usually makes good candidate.
Type of diet is not mentioned in the passage. So A, B can easily eliminated.
Nowhere in passage it is mentioned that how to determine species of the animal, so eliminate D
Nowhere it is mentioned in the passage about who walks where while travelling. This eliminates C
Therefore answer must be E.
Nowhere in passage it is mentioned that how to determine species of the animal, so eliminate D
Nowhere it is mentioned in the passage about who walks where while travelling. This eliminates C
Therefore answer must be E.
paes wrote:Yes guys, OA is E only.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
