• NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
    NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
    NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
    Hundreds of Questions Highly Detailed Reporting Expert Explanations TAKE A FREE GMAT QUIZ
  • 7 CATs FREE!
    If you earn 100 Forum Points

    Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
    100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE

    Veritas Prep
    VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS
    Earn 10 Points Per Post
    Earn 10 Points Per Thanks
    Earn 10 Points Per Upvote
    REDEEM NOW

Nanotechnology may pose risks in the coming decades

This topic has 1 expert reply and 1 member reply

Nanotechnology may pose risks in the coming decades

Post
Nanotechnology may pose risks in the coming decades as we find it increasingly commonplace to introduce small robots into our bodies. But the fact that these robots might be invisible to the naked eye doesn't mean we are helpless against them. After all, since the initial development of germ theory, we have designed and continuously improved upon way to protect ourselves from a variety of germs.

In the passage, the author develops the argument by:

a) forming the hypothesis that best explains several apparently conflicting pieces of evidence
b) reinterpreting evidence that had been used to support an earlier theory
c) using an analogy with a known phenomenon to draw a conclusion about an unknown phenomenon.
d) speculating about how characteristics of small robots in the future might develop from characteristics of germs
e) pointing out difference between natural and human made microscopic threats

Can some experts explain how to determine the best Option?


OA C

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

GMAT/MBA Expert

Legendary Member
Joined
14 Jan 2015
Posted:
2667 messages
Followed by:
122 members
Upvotes:
1153
GMAT Score:
770
Top Reply
Post
lheiannie07 wrote:
Nanotechnology may pose risks in the coming decades as we find it increasingly commonplace to introduce small robots into our bodies. But the fact that these robots might be invisible to the naked eye doesn't mean we are helpless against them. After all, since the initial development of germ theory, we have designed and continuously improved upon way to protect ourselves from a variety of germs.

In the passage, the author develops the argument by:

a) forming the hypothesis that best explains several apparently conflicting pieces of evidence
b) reinterpreting evidence that had been used to support an earlier theory
c) using an analogy with a known phenomenon to draw a conclusion about an unknown phenomenon.
d) speculating about how characteristics of small robots in the future might develop from characteristics of germs
e) pointing out difference between natural and human made microscopic threats

Can some experts explain how to determine the best Option?


OA C
The argument boiled down: Tiny robots might be scary because we can't see them. But we can't see germs, and we've been able to deal with the threat germs pose.

So we have this scary unknown thing: tiny robots; But we shouldn't be frightened because of how well we've dealt with a known thing: germs. Best captured in C

_________________
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!
Post
DavidG@VeritasPrep wrote:
lheiannie07 wrote:
Nanotechnology may pose risks in the coming decades as we find it increasingly commonplace to introduce small robots into our bodies. But the fact that these robots might be invisible to the naked eye doesn't mean we are helpless against them. After all, since the initial development of germ theory, we have designed and continuously improved upon way to protect ourselves from a variety of germs.

In the passage, the author develops the argument by:

a) forming the hypothesis that best explains several apparently conflicting pieces of evidence
b) reinterpreting evidence that had been used to support an earlier theory
c) using an analogy with a known phenomenon to draw a conclusion about an unknown phenomenon.
d) speculating about how characteristics of small robots in the future might develop from characteristics of germs
e) pointing out difference between natural and human made microscopic threats

Can some experts explain how to determine the best Option?


OA C
The argument boiled down: Tiny robots might be scary because we can't see them. But we can't see germs, and we've been able to deal with the threat germs pose.

So we have this scary unknown thing: tiny robots; But we shouldn't be frightened because of how well we've dealt with a known thing: germs. Best captured in C
Thanks a lot!

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • The Princeton Review
    FREE GMAT Exam
    Know how you'd score today for $0

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    The Princeton Review
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors

Top First Responders*

1 Brent@GMATPrepNow 39 first replies
2 Ian Stewart 37 first replies
3 Jay@ManhattanReview 32 first replies
4 GMATGuruNY 26 first replies
5 Scott@TargetTestPrep 15 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

Most Active Experts

1 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

199 posts
2 image description Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

90 posts
3 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

71 posts
4 image description GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

45 posts
5 image description Ian Stewart

GMATiX Teacher

43 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts