In stmt 2, is it wrong to assume that there are multiple even numbers in set N? But based on the wording, it looks like one can go that way. In real GMAT, do we see such instances?
- Attachments
-
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
RedeemTarget Test Prep · GMAT
Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.
TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

with Chris Peckover

with Logan Thompson
Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.
Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.
We seem to have the same line of thought. Even I went for B. But OA is C. However, this is not a GMAT official problem. So I wanted to check if we see such kind of nuances in the real GMAT. Thoughts?scoobydooby wrote:yes agree that sum would mean more than one number.
so there cant be just one even. only 2 evens can give a sum of 10 (either 2+8 or 6+4). would go for B.
I don't understand how to use statement 2 to figure out the number of even nums? can anyone explain pls?Harbinder wrote:IMO it should be C
As per statement 2 there are three posibilities
10
8,2
6,4
Statement 1 tells us that the product to numbers in N is odd multiple of 16. (16, 48, 80...)
and only option 8,2 satisfies both the statements.
What is OA?
New here Create free account