BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

GMAT Number Properties

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:57 am
Thanked: 3 times

GMAT Number Properties

by abhi75 » Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:42 am
If k is a positive integer, is k the square of an integer?
(1) k is divisible by 4.
(2) k is divisible by exactly 4 different prime numbers.

From 1) the info is not sufficient as 4 is a square of an integer but 8,12 is not.

Choices left are B, C, and D.

From 2) The info is not sufficient as 210^2 is divisible by exactly 2,3,5,7 which is a square of a number but 210 by itself is not a square of a number.
So with that reasoning you cancel B. Please let me know if this reasoning is not correct.

The choices left are C and E. Now I was not able to find a number which is divisible by 4 and also divisible by exactly 4 different prime numbers.

But whenever I am not able to come to answer for a question from choices C,E the actual answer is always opposite of what I pick :).

My natural hunch was E but I selected C in this case.

But the OA is E.

Did anyone else also comes across this C/E conundrum at all. Any tips on handling the DS problems when it comes to pick choice C or E.

In my case I always have a tendency to pick an incorrect choice.

Thanks.
-A
Top
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Tue Jun 10, 2008 7:12 am
You got very close to the answer here- your logic is perfect when you look at each statement individually. When it comes to combining the two statements, consider these numbers:

(2^2)*3*5*7 --> this is divisible by 4, and is divisible by exactly four different primes, but is not the square of an integer;

(2^2)*(3^2)*(5^2)*(7^2) --> this is divisible by 4, and is divisible by exactly four different primes, and is the square of an integer; its positive square root is 2*3*5*7.

So we still don't have enough information.

The above illustrates the value of working with prime factorizations- you don't need to bother calculating the numbers here, so it's very fast. You just need to know how to recognize a perfect square from a prime factorization- all the exponents must be even numbers.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1169
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:34 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by aj5105 » Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:04 am
Helpful tip,Ian.
Ian Stewart wrote:You got very close to the answer here- your logic is perfect when you look at each statement individually. When it comes to combining the two statements, consider these numbers:

(2^2)*3*5*7 --> this is divisible by 4, and is divisible by exactly four different primes, but is not the square of an integer;

(2^2)*(3^2)*(5^2)*(7^2) --> this is divisible by 4, and is divisible by exactly four different primes, and is the square of an integer; its positive square root is 2*3*5*7.

So we still don't have enough information.

The above illustrates the value of working with prime factorizations- you don't need to bother calculating the numbers here, so it's very fast. You just need to know how to recognize a perfect square from a prime factorization- all the exponents must be even numbers.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1