BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Number Properties

Expert replies
by abhi75 » Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:42 am
If k is a positive integer, is k the square of an integer?
(1) k is divisible by 4.
(2) k is divisible by exactly 4 different prime numbers.

From 1) the info is not sufficient as 4 is a square of an integer but 8,12 is not.

Choices left are B, C, and D.

From 2) The info is not sufficient as 210^2 is divisible by exactly 2,3,5,7 which is a square of a number but 210 by itself is not a square of a number.
So with that reasoning you cancel B. Please let me know if this reasoning is not correct.

The choices left are C and E. Now I was not able to find a number which is divisible by 4 and also divisible by exactly 4 different prime numbers.

But whenever I am not able to come to answer for a question from choices C,E the actual answer is always opposite of what I pick :).

My natural hunch was E but I selected C in this case.

But the OA is E.

Did anyone else also comes across this C/E conundrum at all. Any tips on handling the DS problems when it comes to pick choice C or E.

In my case I always have a tendency to pick an incorrect choice.

Thanks.
-A
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Ian Stewart » Tue Jun 10, 2008 7:12 am
You got very close to the answer here- your logic is perfect when you look at each statement individually. When it comes to combining the two statements, consider these numbers:

(2^2)*3*5*7 --> this is divisible by 4, and is divisible by exactly four different primes, but is not the square of an integer;

(2^2)*(3^2)*(5^2)*(7^2) --> this is divisible by 4, and is divisible by exactly four different primes, and is the square of an integer; its positive square root is 2*3*5*7.

So we still don't have enough information.

The above illustrates the value of working with prime factorizations- you don't need to bother calculating the numbers here, so it's very fast. You just need to know how to recognize a perfect square from a prime factorization- all the exponents must be even numbers.
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:04 am
Helpful tip,Ian.
Ian Stewart wrote:You got very close to the answer here- your logic is perfect when you look at each statement individually. When it comes to combining the two statements, consider these numbers:

(2^2)*3*5*7 --> this is divisible by 4, and is divisible by exactly four different primes, but is not the square of an integer;

(2^2)*(3^2)*(5^2)*(7^2) --> this is divisible by 4, and is divisible by exactly four different primes, and is the square of an integer; its positive square root is 2*3*5*7.

So we still don't have enough information.

The above illustrates the value of working with prime factorizations- you don't need to bother calculating the numbers here, so it's very fast. You just need to know how to recognize a perfect square from a prime factorization- all the exponents must be even numbers.
Join the discussion