BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Absolute Values

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by maihuna » Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:00 am
IMO :A

if b>a, |a|-|b| will always be negative while |a-b| always positive, so relations is established

1, b>a, b=5, a=3, |a-b| = |3-5| = 2, |a|-|b| = 3-5 = -2, so |a-b| > |a-b|
b=5, a=-3, |a-b| = |5-(-3)| = 8, |a|-|b| = -8
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by ST2011 » Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:03 am
Answer seems to C

If you combine two inequalities b>a>0 then b will be always greater than a and it will +ve. Now |a|-|b| will be alway smaller than |a-b| because the |a|-|b| will be always -Ve and since this is YES/NO the answer will be alway "no"
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:37 am
koby_gen wrote:Is |a| - |b| >= | a - b | ?

(1) b > a
(2) a > 0
Statement 1: b > a
Say, a = 0 and b = 3 => |a| - |b| = -3 < |a - b| = 3
Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3

Not sufficient

Statement 2: a > 0
Say, a = 1 and b = 2 => |a| - |b| = -1 < |a - b| = 1
Say, a = 1 and b = 0 => |a| - |b| = 1 = |a - b| = 1

Not sufficient

1 & 2 Together: b > a > 0
Hence, |a| - |b| < 0
But, |a - b| > 0

Hence, |a| - |b| < |a - b|

Sufficient

The correct answer is C.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by rohu27 » Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:26 pm
Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
even in the above |a| - |b| < |a - b|
for any value of b>a it holds true.
so the answer shud be A rite?
im i missing sumthgn here, inequalities combined wth absolute values in DS is a deadly combo for me :(


Anurag@Gurome wrote:
koby_gen wrote:Is |a| - |b| >= | a - b | ?

(1) b > a
(2) a > 0
Statement 1: b > a
Say, a = 0 and b = 3 => |a| - |b| = -3 < |a - b| = 3
Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3

Not sufficient

Statement 2: a > 0
Say, a = 1 and b = 2 => |a| - |b| = -1 < |a - b| = 1
Say, a = 1 and b = 0 => |a| - |b| = 1 = |a - b| = 1

Not sufficient

1 & 2 Together: b > a > 0
Hence, |a| - |b| < 0
But, |a - b| > 0

Hence, |a| - |b| < |a - b|

Sufficient

The correct answer is C.
Join the discussion

by madhan_dc » Thu Feb 24, 2011 10:51 am
1. b>a

values i picked

a b
2 3
-3 -2

i found that for any vlaue of a and b when b>a, | a| - |b| turned out to be <= |a-b|

hence sufficent

similarly for

2. a> 0

a b
2 1
2 4
2 -1
2 0

again for all values of a,b, |a| - |b| turned out to be <= |a-b|

heance sufficent. I would have picked D. Either statement is sufficent. Please correct my thought process if it is wrong. Thanks
Join the discussion

by rohu27 » Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:11 pm
madhan_dc

for st 2, if a=2 b=-1, then | a| - |b| < |a-b|
but if a=2 b=1 then | a| - |b| = |a-b|
hence not suff.


madhan_dc wrote:1. b>a

values i picked

a b
2 3
-3 -2

i found that for any vlaue of a and b when b>a, | a| - |b| turned out to be <= |a-b|

hence sufficent

similarly for

2. a> 0

a b
2 1
2 4
2 -1
2 0

again for all values of a,b, |a| - |b| turned out to be <= |a-b|

heance sufficent. I would have picked D. Either statement is sufficent. Please correct my thought process if it is wrong. Thanks
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:51 pm
rohu27 wrote:Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
even in the above |a| - |b| < |a - b|
for any value of b>a it holds true.
so the answer shud be A rite?
im i missing sumthgn here, inequalities combined wth absolute values in DS is a deadly combo for me :(



Ok try a=3 & b= 4....

Does ur stmt hold true??
Join the discussion

by rohu27 » Fri Feb 25, 2011 12:03 am
ofcourse,
even wth a=3,b=4
|a| - |b| < |a - b|
nd this would hold true for all values of b>a.

gmatmachoman wrote:
rohu27 wrote:Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
even in the above |a| - |b| < |a - b|
for any value of b>a it holds true.
so the answer shud be A rite?
im i missing sumthgn here, inequalities combined wth absolute values in DS is a deadly combo for me :(



Ok try a=3 & b= 4....

Does ur stmt hold true??
Join the discussion

by kareem.firoz » Fri Feb 25, 2011 12:41 am
@Anurag, How can 1 be > 3? You have stated so and I quote.
Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3?

According to me, Each statement alone is sufficient.
Logic: |a-b| is always a +ve number
Let us analyze |a| - |b|, based on the two statements.
1) b> a. In this case |a|-|b| can become negative when both a & b are +ve. Hence this is sufficient to say that
|a|-|b| is not always >= |a-b|.
2) a>0. In this case |a|-|b| can be negative when b>a ie when a & b are +ve. Hence this statement is sufficient to say that |a|-|b| is not always >= |a-b|.
So the answer is Each Statements Alone is Sufficient.
Correct me if i'm wrong.

Thanks,
FK
rohu27 wrote:Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
even in the above |a| - |b| < |a - b|
for any value of b>a it holds true.
so the answer shud be A rite?
im i missing sumthgn here, inequalities combined wth absolute values in DS is a deadly combo for me :(


Anurag@Gurome wrote:
koby_gen wrote:Is |a| - |b| >= | a - b | ?

(1) b > a
(2) a > 0
Statement 1: b > a
Say, a = 0 and b = 3 => |a| - |b| = -3 < |a - b| = 3
Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3

Not sufficient

Statement 2: a > 0
Say, a = 1 and b = 2 => |a| - |b| = -1 < |a - b| = 1
Say, a = 1 and b = 0 => |a| - |b| = 1 = |a - b| = 1

Not sufficient

1 & 2 Together: b > a > 0
Hence, |a| - |b| < 0
But, |a - b| > 0

Hence, |a| - |b| < |a - b|

Sufficient

The correct answer is C.
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Tue Mar 01, 2011 10:56 pm
IMO A is sufficient.

Please post OA
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Thu Mar 03, 2011 12:38 pm
rohu27 wrote:Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
even in the above |a| - |b| < |a - b|
for any value of b>a it holds true.
so the answer shud be A rite?
im i missing sumthgn here, inequalities combined wth absolute values in DS is a deadly combo for me :(



[
Ok, u took b>a. but what if a<b<0??

a= -5 b= -4

then LHS = 1 & RHS = 1. So the prompt becomes YES

case 2 : a= 3 b = 5

LHS : -2 & RHS will be a positive number 2. Now it says NO.

So st1 is not sufficient.
Join the discussion

by rohu27 » Thu Mar 03, 2011 7:01 pm
Is |a| - |b| >= | a - b | ?

(1) b > a

(2) a > 0

okay let me analyse all the cases possible here.

st 1 b>a
for b>a>0, LHS is always < RHS. b=5, a=3. LHS=-2, RHS=2.
for a<b<0. a=-5,b=-2. LHS=3, RHS=3. LHS=RHS. for all negative values, LHS=RHS.
so form 1 we get, |a| - |b| < =| a - b |
the question asks whether |a| - |b| >= | a - b |,
im confused here as to wht shud the answer choice be?
shudnt it be A?
gmatmachoman wrote:
rohu27 wrote:Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
even in the above |a| - |b| < |a - b|
for any value of b>a it holds true.
so the answer shud be A rite?
im i missing sumthgn here, inequalities combined wth absolute values in DS is a deadly combo for me :(



[
Ok, u took b>a. but what if a<b<0??

a= -5 b= -4

then LHS = 1 & RHS = 1. So the prompt becomes YES

case 2 : a= 3 b = 5

LHS : -2 & RHS will be a positive number 2. Now it says NO.

So st1 is not sufficient.
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Thu Mar 03, 2011 8:38 pm
@rohu
st(1) b>a means that b-a>0 OR a-b<0. So we need to validate |a|-|b| >=0 OR |a|>=|b| OR a^2>b^2 Is this true? No, because it says in st(1) that b>a Not Sufficient // do you agree?
st(2) a>0. So we need to validate a - |b| >= |a-b| OR a>= |a-b| + |b|
case 1) (a-b)>0, a>b and b>0 .... a>a-b+b, 0>0 this is invalid determination;
case 2) (a-b)=0, a=b and since a>0 then b>0 .... a>0+b, a>b this contradicts to a=b, hence invalid determination;
case 3) (a-b)<0, a<b and since a>0 then b>0 .... a>b-a+b, a>b this contradicts to a<b, hence invalid determination;
statement (2) proved Not Sufficient;
Combined st(1&2): a>0 and b>a, hence b>0 --> a-b >=|a-b| ? if a-b>0 then a>b canceled, if a-b<0 then a<b valid, if a-b=0 then a=b canceled --> we keep only one condition for |a-b| which a-b<0 Sufficient

answer C
rohu27 wrote:Is |a| - |b| >= | a - b | ?

(1) b > a

(2) a > 0


okay let me analyse all the cases possible here.

st 1 b>a
for b>a>0, LHS is always < RHS. b=5, a=3. LHS=-2, RHS=2.
for a<b<0. a=-5,b=-2. LHS=3, RHS=3. LHS=RHS. for all negative values, LHS=RHS.
so form 1 we get, |a| - |b| < =| a - b |
the question asks whether |a| - |b| >= | a - b |,
im confused here as to wht shud the answer choice be?
shudnt it be A?
gmatmachoman wrote:
rohu27 wrote:Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
even in the above |a| - |b| < |a - b|
for any value of b>a it holds true.
so the answer shud be A rite?
im i missing sumthgn here, inequalities combined wth absolute values in DS is a deadly combo for me :(



[
Ok, u took b>a. but what if a<b<0??

a= -5 b= -4

then LHS = 1 & RHS = 1. So the prompt becomes YES

case 2 : a= 3 b = 5

LHS : -2 & RHS will be a positive number 2. Now it says NO.

So st1 is not sufficient.
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Join the discussion

by rohu27 » Thu Mar 03, 2011 10:11 pm
aah...get it now.
thanks gmatmachoman for pointing it out
and Nightreader for a diff approach for such prblems.
Join the discussion