Is |a| - |b| >= | a - b | ?
(1) b > a
(2) a > 0
Absolute Values
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
- Thanked: 82 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:720
IMO :A
if b>a, |a|-|b| will always be negative while |a-b| always positive, so relations is established
1, b>a, b=5, a=3, |a-b| = |3-5| = 2, |a|-|b| = 3-5 = -2, so |a-b| > |a-b|
b=5, a=-3, |a-b| = |5-(-3)| = 8, |a|-|b| = -8
if b>a, |a|-|b| will always be negative while |a-b| always positive, so relations is established
1, b>a, b=5, a=3, |a-b| = |3-5| = 2, |a|-|b| = 3-5 = -2, so |a-b| > |a-b|
b=5, a=-3, |a-b| = |5-(-3)| = 8, |a|-|b| = -8
Charged up again to beat the beast ![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
Answer seems to C
If you combine two inequalities b>a>0 then b will be always greater than a and it will +ve. Now |a|-|b| will be alway smaller than |a-b| because the |a|-|b| will be always -Ve and since this is YES/NO the answer will be alway "no"
If you combine two inequalities b>a>0 then b will be always greater than a and it will +ve. Now |a|-|b| will be alway smaller than |a-b| because the |a|-|b| will be always -Ve and since this is YES/NO the answer will be alway "no"
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Anurag@Gurome
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3835
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Milpitas, CA
- Thanked: 1854 times
- Followed by:523 members
- GMAT Score:770
Statement 1: b > akoby_gen wrote:Is |a| - |b| >= | a - b | ?
(1) b > a
(2) a > 0
Say, a = 0 and b = 3 => |a| - |b| = -3 < |a - b| = 3
Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
Not sufficient
Statement 2: a > 0
Say, a = 1 and b = 2 => |a| - |b| = -1 < |a - b| = 1
Say, a = 1 and b = 0 => |a| - |b| = 1 = |a - b| = 1
Not sufficient
1 & 2 Together: b > a > 0
Hence, |a| - |b| < 0
But, |a - b| > 0
Hence, |a| - |b| < |a - b|
Sufficient
The correct answer is C.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 am
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:5 members
- GMAT Score:730
Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
even in the above |a| - |b| < |a - b|
for any value of b>a it holds true.
so the answer shud be A rite?
im i missing sumthgn here, inequalities combined wth absolute values in DS is a deadly combo for me![Sad :(](./images/smilies/sad.png)
even in the above |a| - |b| < |a - b|
for any value of b>a it holds true.
so the answer shud be A rite?
im i missing sumthgn here, inequalities combined wth absolute values in DS is a deadly combo for me
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/sad.png)
Anurag@Gurome wrote:Statement 1: b > akoby_gen wrote:Is |a| - |b| >= | a - b | ?
(1) b > a
(2) a > 0
Say, a = 0 and b = 3 => |a| - |b| = -3 < |a - b| = 3
Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
Not sufficient
Statement 2: a > 0
Say, a = 1 and b = 2 => |a| - |b| = -1 < |a - b| = 1
Say, a = 1 and b = 0 => |a| - |b| = 1 = |a - b| = 1
Not sufficient
1 & 2 Together: b > a > 0
Hence, |a| - |b| < 0
But, |a - b| > 0
Hence, |a| - |b| < |a - b|
Sufficient
The correct answer is C.
1. b>a
values i picked
a b
2 3
-3 -2
i found that for any vlaue of a and b when b>a, | a| - |b| turned out to be <= |a-b|
hence sufficent
similarly for
2. a> 0
a b
2 1
2 4
2 -1
2 0
again for all values of a,b, |a| - |b| turned out to be <= |a-b|
heance sufficent. I would have picked D. Either statement is sufficent. Please correct my thought process if it is wrong. Thanks
values i picked
a b
2 3
-3 -2
i found that for any vlaue of a and b when b>a, | a| - |b| turned out to be <= |a-b|
hence sufficent
similarly for
2. a> 0
a b
2 1
2 4
2 -1
2 0
again for all values of a,b, |a| - |b| turned out to be <= |a-b|
heance sufficent. I would have picked D. Either statement is sufficent. Please correct my thought process if it is wrong. Thanks
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 am
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:5 members
- GMAT Score:730
madhan_dc
for st 2, if a=2 b=-1, then | a| - |b| < |a-b|
but if a=2 b=1 then | a| - |b| = |a-b|
hence not suff.
for st 2, if a=2 b=-1, then | a| - |b| < |a-b|
but if a=2 b=1 then | a| - |b| = |a-b|
hence not suff.
madhan_dc wrote:1. b>a
values i picked
a b
2 3
-3 -2
i found that for any vlaue of a and b when b>a, | a| - |b| turned out to be <= |a-b|
hence sufficent
similarly for
2. a> 0
a b
2 1
2 4
2 -1
2 0
again for all values of a,b, |a| - |b| turned out to be <= |a-b|
heance sufficent. I would have picked D. Either statement is sufficent. Please correct my thought process if it is wrong. Thanks
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
- Thanked: 173 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:710
rohu27 wrote:Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
even in the above |a| - |b| < |a - b|
for any value of b>a it holds true.
so the answer shud be A rite?
im i missing sumthgn here, inequalities combined wth absolute values in DS is a deadly combo for me
Ok try a=3 & b= 4....
Does ur stmt hold true??
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 am
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:5 members
- GMAT Score:730
ofcourse,
even wth a=3,b=4
|a| - |b| < |a - b|
nd this would hold true for all values of b>a.
even wth a=3,b=4
|a| - |b| < |a - b|
nd this would hold true for all values of b>a.
gmatmachoman wrote:rohu27 wrote:Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
even in the above |a| - |b| < |a - b|
for any value of b>a it holds true.
so the answer shud be A rite?
im i missing sumthgn here, inequalities combined wth absolute values in DS is a deadly combo for me
Ok try a=3 & b= 4....
Does ur stmt hold true??
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:50 pm
@Anurag, How can 1 be > 3? You have stated so and I quote.
Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3?
According to me, Each statement alone is sufficient.
Logic: |a-b| is always a +ve number
Let us analyze |a| - |b|, based on the two statements.
1) b> a. In this case |a|-|b| can become negative when both a & b are +ve. Hence this is sufficient to say that
|a|-|b| is not always >= |a-b|.
2) a>0. In this case |a|-|b| can be negative when b>a ie when a & b are +ve. Hence this statement is sufficient to say that |a|-|b| is not always >= |a-b|.
So the answer is Each Statements Alone is Sufficient.
Correct me if i'm wrong.
Thanks,
FK
Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3?
According to me, Each statement alone is sufficient.
Logic: |a-b| is always a +ve number
Let us analyze |a| - |b|, based on the two statements.
1) b> a. In this case |a|-|b| can become negative when both a & b are +ve. Hence this is sufficient to say that
|a|-|b| is not always >= |a-b|.
2) a>0. In this case |a|-|b| can be negative when b>a ie when a & b are +ve. Hence this statement is sufficient to say that |a|-|b| is not always >= |a-b|.
So the answer is Each Statements Alone is Sufficient.
Correct me if i'm wrong.
Thanks,
FK
rohu27 wrote:Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
even in the above |a| - |b| < |a - b|
for any value of b>a it holds true.
so the answer shud be A rite?
im i missing sumthgn here, inequalities combined wth absolute values in DS is a deadly combo for me
Anurag@Gurome wrote:Statement 1: b > akoby_gen wrote:Is |a| - |b| >= | a - b | ?
(1) b > a
(2) a > 0
Say, a = 0 and b = 3 => |a| - |b| = -3 < |a - b| = 3
Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
Not sufficient
Statement 2: a > 0
Say, a = 1 and b = 2 => |a| - |b| = -1 < |a - b| = 1
Say, a = 1 and b = 0 => |a| - |b| = 1 = |a - b| = 1
Not sufficient
1 & 2 Together: b > a > 0
Hence, |a| - |b| < 0
But, |a - b| > 0
Hence, |a| - |b| < |a - b|
Sufficient
The correct answer is C.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
- Thanked: 173 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:710
Ok, u took b>a. but what if a<b<0??rohu27 wrote:Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
even in the above |a| - |b| < |a - b|
for any value of b>a it holds true.
so the answer shud be A rite?
im i missing sumthgn here, inequalities combined wth absolute values in DS is a deadly combo for me
[
a= -5 b= -4
then LHS = 1 & RHS = 1. So the prompt becomes YES
case 2 : a= 3 b = 5
LHS : -2 & RHS will be a positive number 2. Now it says NO.
So st1 is not sufficient.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 am
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:5 members
- GMAT Score:730
Is |a| - |b| >= | a - b | ?
(1) b > a
(2) a > 0
okay let me analyse all the cases possible here.
st 1 b>a
for b>a>0, LHS is always < RHS. b=5, a=3. LHS=-2, RHS=2.
for a<b<0. a=-5,b=-2. LHS=3, RHS=3. LHS=RHS. for all negative values, LHS=RHS.
so form 1 we get, |a| - |b| < =| a - b |
the question asks whether |a| - |b| >= | a - b |,
im confused here as to wht shud the answer choice be?
shudnt it be A?
(1) b > a
(2) a > 0
okay let me analyse all the cases possible here.
st 1 b>a
for b>a>0, LHS is always < RHS. b=5, a=3. LHS=-2, RHS=2.
for a<b<0. a=-5,b=-2. LHS=3, RHS=3. LHS=RHS. for all negative values, LHS=RHS.
so form 1 we get, |a| - |b| < =| a - b |
the question asks whether |a| - |b| >= | a - b |,
im confused here as to wht shud the answer choice be?
shudnt it be A?
gmatmachoman wrote:Ok, u took b>a. but what if a<b<0??rohu27 wrote:Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
even in the above |a| - |b| < |a - b|
for any value of b>a it holds true.
so the answer shud be A rite?
im i missing sumthgn here, inequalities combined wth absolute values in DS is a deadly combo for me
[
a= -5 b= -4
then LHS = 1 & RHS = 1. So the prompt becomes YES
case 2 : a= 3 b = 5
LHS : -2 & RHS will be a positive number 2. Now it says NO.
So st1 is not sufficient.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:29 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:10 members
@rohu
st(1) b>a means that b-a>0 OR a-b<0. So we need to validate |a|-|b| >=0 OR |a|>=|b| OR a^2>b^2 Is this true? No, because it says in st(1) that b>a Not Sufficient // do you agree?
st(2) a>0. So we need to validate a - |b| >= |a-b| OR a>= |a-b| + |b|
case 1) (a-b)>0, a>b and b>0 .... a>a-b+b, 0>0 this is invalid determination;
case 2) (a-b)=0, a=b and since a>0 then b>0 .... a>0+b, a>b this contradicts to a=b, hence invalid determination;
case 3) (a-b)<0, a<b and since a>0 then b>0 .... a>b-a+b, a>b this contradicts to a<b, hence invalid determination;
statement (2) proved Not Sufficient;
Combined st(1&2): a>0 and b>a, hence b>0 --> a-b >=|a-b| ? if a-b>0 then a>b canceled, if a-b<0 then a<b valid, if a-b=0 then a=b canceled --> we keep only one condition for |a-b| which a-b<0 Sufficient
answer C
st(1) b>a means that b-a>0 OR a-b<0. So we need to validate |a|-|b| >=0 OR |a|>=|b| OR a^2>b^2 Is this true? No, because it says in st(1) that b>a Not Sufficient // do you agree?
st(2) a>0. So we need to validate a - |b| >= |a-b| OR a>= |a-b| + |b|
case 1) (a-b)>0, a>b and b>0 .... a>a-b+b, 0>0 this is invalid determination;
case 2) (a-b)=0, a=b and since a>0 then b>0 .... a>0+b, a>b this contradicts to a=b, hence invalid determination;
case 3) (a-b)<0, a<b and since a>0 then b>0 .... a>b-a+b, a>b this contradicts to a<b, hence invalid determination;
statement (2) proved Not Sufficient;
Combined st(1&2): a>0 and b>a, hence b>0 --> a-b >=|a-b| ? if a-b>0 then a>b canceled, if a-b<0 then a<b valid, if a-b=0 then a=b canceled --> we keep only one condition for |a-b| which a-b<0 Sufficient
answer C
rohu27 wrote:Is |a| - |b| >= | a - b | ?
(1) b > a
(2) a > 0
okay let me analyse all the cases possible here.
st 1 b>a
for b>a>0, LHS is always < RHS. b=5, a=3. LHS=-2, RHS=2.
for a<b<0. a=-5,b=-2. LHS=3, RHS=3. LHS=RHS. for all negative values, LHS=RHS.
so form 1 we get, |a| - |b| < =| a - b |
the question asks whether |a| - |b| >= | a - b |,
im confused here as to wht shud the answer choice be?
shudnt it be A?
gmatmachoman wrote:Ok, u took b>a. but what if a<b<0??rohu27 wrote:Say, a = -2 and b = 1 => |a| - |b| = 1 > |a - b| = 3
even in the above |a| - |b| < |a - b|
for any value of b>a it holds true.
so the answer shud be A rite?
im i missing sumthgn here, inequalities combined wth absolute values in DS is a deadly combo for me
[
a= -5 b= -4
then LHS = 1 & RHS = 1. So the prompt becomes YES
case 2 : a= 3 b = 5
LHS : -2 & RHS will be a positive number 2. Now it says NO.
So st1 is not sufficient.
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com