Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

municipality bonds

Expert replies
by siddhu161 » Fri Jan 24, 2014 10:14 pm
Public hospitals are suffering because of a lack of money available for physical expansion projects. To help hospitals, local governments plan to offer municipal bonds with above-average interest rates to induce individuals to buy these bonds, because as local governments get more money from municipal bonds, more money becomes available to public hospitals for physical expansion projects.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt regarding the effectiveness of local governments' plan to increase the amount of money available for hospital expansion projects?

A. When local governments increase the interest on municipal bonds, the percentage of government funds allocated to non-expansion government projects increases correspondingly.

B. The increased revenue local governments would receive as a result of offering municipal bonds with above-average interest rates would not offset the loss in revenue from personal income taxes during the first year of the plan.

C. Even with interest rate incentives, some people will choose not to buy the municipal bonds.

D. Individuals will generally not buy high-interest municipal bonds unless these bonds, when repaid, will help them cover home and healthcare payments.

E. The municipal bonds would give all buyers, regardless of how many bonds they purchase, the same interest rate per bond.

OA is A but I came up with D. Although D could also be wrong as there is no information on types of bonds municipality offering, I crossed A because it talks about increasing % of (probabely existing)bonds whereas the argument talks about offering new bonds with higher rate.

Please help me with the same.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by bubbliiiiiiii » Sun Jan 26, 2014 8:59 am
I don't understand how A is OA! because if A is true the amount of money available for hospital expansion projects still increases! because even if the proportion is same, the amount increases.
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by Sk1ver » Mon Jan 27, 2014 5:10 am
siddhu161 wrote:Public hospitals are suffering because of a lack of money available for physical expansion projects. To help hospitals, local governments plan to offer municipal bonds with above-average interest rates to induce individuals to buy these bonds, because as local governments get more money from municipal bonds, more money becomes available to public hospitals for physical expansion projects.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt regarding the effectiveness of local governments' plan to increase the amount of money available for hospital expansion projects?

A. When local governments increase the interest on municipal bonds, the percentage of government funds allocated to non-expansion government projects increases correspondingly.

B. The increased revenue local governments would receive as a result of offering municipal bonds with above-average interest rates would not offset the loss in revenue from personal income taxes during the first year of the plan.

C. Even with interest rate incentives, some people will choose not to buy the municipal bonds.

D. Individuals will generally not buy high-interest municipal bonds unless these bonds, when repaid, will help them cover home and healthcare payments.

E. The municipal bonds would give all buyers, regardless of how many bonds they purchase, the same interest rate per bond.

OA is A but I came up with D. Although D could also be wrong as there is no information on types of bonds municipality offering, I crossed A because it talks about increasing % of (probabely existing)bonds whereas the argument talks about offering new bonds with higher rate.

Please help me with the same.
Well Im not sure for 100% that ive applied the correct figures, but I think that the logic behind A is the following:

Try to use some numbers

Base case:

Bonds issued - 100$
Interest 10%
Total money - 10$
% allocated to physical expansion - 50% - 5$
% allocated to non-physical expansion - 50% - 5$

Answer choice A says:

Bonds issued - 100$
Interest 15% (increased by 50%)
Total money - 15$
% allocated to physical expansion - 25% - 2.25$
% allocated to non-physical expansion - (allocated percentage increased correspondingly by 50%) 75% * 1.5 = 11.25$

So we can see that physical expansion is now getting less money
Join the discussion