BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

municipality bonds

Expert replies
by siddhu161 » Fri Jan 24, 2014 10:14 pm
Public hospitals are suffering because of a lack of money available for physical expansion projects. To help hospitals, local governments plan to offer municipal bonds with above-average interest rates to induce individuals to buy these bonds, because as local governments get more money from municipal bonds, more money becomes available to public hospitals for physical expansion projects.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt regarding the effectiveness of local governments' plan to increase the amount of money available for hospital expansion projects?

A. When local governments increase the interest on municipal bonds, the percentage of government funds allocated to non-expansion government projects increases correspondingly.

B. The increased revenue local governments would receive as a result of offering municipal bonds with above-average interest rates would not offset the loss in revenue from personal income taxes during the first year of the plan.

C. Even with interest rate incentives, some people will choose not to buy the municipal bonds.

D. Individuals will generally not buy high-interest municipal bonds unless these bonds, when repaid, will help them cover home and healthcare payments.

E. The municipal bonds would give all buyers, regardless of how many bonds they purchase, the same interest rate per bond.

OA is A but I came up with D. Although D could also be wrong as there is no information on types of bonds municipality offering, I crossed A because it talks about increasing % of (probabely existing)bonds whereas the argument talks about offering new bonds with higher rate.

Please help me with the same.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by bubbliiiiiiii » Sun Jan 26, 2014 8:59 am
I don't understand how A is OA! because if A is true the amount of money available for hospital expansion projects still increases! because even if the proportion is same, the amount increases.
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by Sk1ver » Mon Jan 27, 2014 5:10 am
siddhu161 wrote:Public hospitals are suffering because of a lack of money available for physical expansion projects. To help hospitals, local governments plan to offer municipal bonds with above-average interest rates to induce individuals to buy these bonds, because as local governments get more money from municipal bonds, more money becomes available to public hospitals for physical expansion projects.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt regarding the effectiveness of local governments' plan to increase the amount of money available for hospital expansion projects?

A. When local governments increase the interest on municipal bonds, the percentage of government funds allocated to non-expansion government projects increases correspondingly.

B. The increased revenue local governments would receive as a result of offering municipal bonds with above-average interest rates would not offset the loss in revenue from personal income taxes during the first year of the plan.

C. Even with interest rate incentives, some people will choose not to buy the municipal bonds.

D. Individuals will generally not buy high-interest municipal bonds unless these bonds, when repaid, will help them cover home and healthcare payments.

E. The municipal bonds would give all buyers, regardless of how many bonds they purchase, the same interest rate per bond.

OA is A but I came up with D. Although D could also be wrong as there is no information on types of bonds municipality offering, I crossed A because it talks about increasing % of (probabely existing)bonds whereas the argument talks about offering new bonds with higher rate.

Please help me with the same.
Well Im not sure for 100% that ive applied the correct figures, but I think that the logic behind A is the following:

Try to use some numbers

Base case:

Bonds issued - 100$
Interest 10%
Total money - 10$
% allocated to physical expansion - 50% - 5$
% allocated to non-physical expansion - 50% - 5$

Answer choice A says:

Bonds issued - 100$
Interest 15% (increased by 50%)
Total money - 15$
% allocated to physical expansion - 25% - 2.25$
% allocated to non-physical expansion - (allocated percentage increased correspondingly by 50%) 75% * 1.5 = 11.25$

So we can see that physical expansion is now getting less money
Join the discussion