BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Multiples A

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

TT

by TT » Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:29 pm
I think the answer is A.
Join the discussion

by ri2007 » Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:15 pm
Agree ans should be A

Stat 1) 3y^2+7y = x

3y^ is a multiple of Y, also 7 Y is a multiple of Y so the sum of the two will be a multiple of Y. Since Multiple of Y is = X ans should be yes.

You can plug in diff values and check.

Stat 2) x^2 - x is a multiple of y

Since x^2 - x can be greater than greater than X you cannot determine if X is also a multiple

I have a feeling I have not been able to explain this one properly. Hope it helps ????
Join the discussion

by samirpandeyit62 » Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:52 pm
Stat 1: 3y^2+7y = x

i.e y(3y+7) =x

so x is a multiple of y

stmt 2: x^2 - x is a multiple of y

so x(x-1) is a multiple of y

so y is a factor of x(x-1)

now we cannot say that x is a multiple of y i.e here x may be a multiple of y or it may be x-1

So ans should be A
Regards
Samir
Join the discussion

by girish3131 » Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:13 am
I perfectly agree with th eexplanation that B is not sufficient from yr perspective...

now jus take this in this way ->

x(x-1)/y = k where k is an integer

now x/y = k / (x-1)

now x > 1(given) so take any value for x let say 5

x/y = 4k ie an integer...

so in this way we can say that y is an factor of x

hence B too sufficient....



wat u say..
Last edited by girish3131 on Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:15 am
samirpandeyit62 wrote:Stat 1: 3y^2+7y = x

i.e y(3y+7) =x

so x is a multiple of y

stmt 2: x^2 - x is a multiple of y

so x(x-1) is a multiple of y

so y is a factor of x(x-1)

now we cannot say that x is a multiple of y i.e here x may be a multiple of y or it may be x-1

So ans should be A
good explanation.
St 1: we can clearly say X is a mulitple of Y.(i.e y(3y+7) =x )

St 2: It can be that X or (X-1) can be the multiple of Y.So Insufficient

IMO A
Join the discussion

by girish3131 » Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:18 am
no no...

my point is that B too suffiecient irrespective any value of X
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:49 am
girish3131 wrote:no no...

my point is that B too suffiecient irrespective any value of X
How come?
Join the discussion

by kstv » Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:55 am
x and y are integers greater than 1, is x a multiple of y ?
can be express x = ky where k can be any constant
1) 3y²+7y = x y(3y+7) = x
means y multiplied by (3y+7) = x let (3y+7) = k as k can be any constant
yk = x Suff.
2) x²-x is a multiple of y
so x(x-1) = ky where k can be any constant
x = k/(x-1) *y as x > 1 ( all the while u wonder why this fact was mentioned.)
k / (x-1) will not always be an integer.
if it was given x < 1 eg. 1/2 then k/(x-1) = 2k then x= 2k.y then Suff
but now it's Insufficient.

IMO A
Join the discussion

by girish3131 » Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:11 am
kstv wrote:x and y are integers greater than 1, is x a multiple of y ?
can be express x = ky where k can be any constant
1) 3y²+7y = x y(3y+7) = x
means y multiplied by (3y+7) = x let (3y+7) = k as k can be any constant
yk = x Suff.
2) x²-x is a multiple of y
so x(x-1) = ky where k can be any constant
x = k/(x-1) *y as x > 1 ( all the while u wonder why this fact was mentioned.)
k / (x-1) will not always be an integer.
if it was given x < 1 eg. 1/2 then k/(x-1) = 2k then x= 2k.y then Suff
but now it's Insufficient.

IMO A
KSTV

acc to u , for which value of x , k / (x-1) is not an integer ?
Join the discussion

by kstv » Tue Mar 16, 2010 10:40 pm
girish3131 wrote:
kstv wrote:x and y are integers greater than 1, is x a multiple of y ?
Is the assumption I am making too sweeping
please point out the flaw .
Join the discussion