BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Multiple of 3?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by macattack » Mon Aug 12, 2013 1:52 am
Case 1:
n^3-n=n(n^2-1)=n(n+1)(n-1)
From the above equation either n is a multiple of 3 or n-1 is a multiple of 3 or n+1 is a multiple of 3--->Insufficient

Case 2:
n^3+2n^2+n=n(n^2+2n+1)=n(n+1)^2=n(n+1)(n+1)
Either n or n+1 is a multiple of 3--->If n is a multiple of 3 n-1 is not a multiple of 3 and if n+1 is a multiple of 3 then n-1 is also not a multiple of 3 since multiple of 3s are 3 integers apart.
Hence statement 2 is sufficient. OA is B

Cheers
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:36 am
nipunranjan wrote:Is positive integer n-1 a multiple of 3?

(1) n^3 - n is a multiple of 3
(2) n^3 + 2n^2+ n is a multiple of 3
Target question: Is positive integer n-1 a multiple of 3?

Statement 1: n^3 - n is a multiple of 3
Factor: n^3 - n = n(n^2 - 1) = n(n-1)(n+1) = (n-1)(n)(n+1)
Notice that n-1, n and n+1 are three consecutive numbers.
IMPORTANT: Statement 1 is simply telling us that the product of 3 consecutive integers is divisible by 3. This is not new information. The product of any 3 consecutive integers will always be divisible by 3. In fact, there's a rule that says, "The product of n consecutive integers is divisible by n, n-1, n-2, . . . 2, 1"
Since statement 1 is just some rule that already exists in mathematics, we already knew this information before we even examined statement 1. So, there's no way that statement 1 could possibly add any information to help us answer the target question.
As such, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: n^3 + 2n^2+ n is a multiple of 3
Factor: n^3 + 2n^2+ n = n(n^2 + 2n + 1) = n(n+1)(n+1)
This means that EITHER n is a multiple of 3 OR n+1 is a multiple of 3.
Let's examine both possible cases:
case a: If n is a multiple of 3, then we can find other multiples of 3 by adding or subtracting multiples of 3 to n. So, for example, n+3 and n+6 will be also be multiples of 3. Likewise, n-3 and n-6 will be also be multiples of 3. Since n-1 is just 1 less than n, n-1 cannot be a multiple of 3 .
case b: If n+1 is a multiple of 3, then n-1 cannot be a multiple of 3 , Since n-1 is just 2 less than n+1.
Since both possible cases yielded the same answer to the target question, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer = B

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Mon Aug 12, 2013 7:59 am
S1::

n³ - n = n(n² - 1) = n(n+1)(n-1)

Since (n-1) is an integer, n and (n+1) are integers too. This n³ - n is the product of three consecutive integers, and hence ALWAYS divisible by 3. (If I'm multiplying three consecutive integers, ONE of those integers is a multiple of 3, so the product is also a multiple of 3.)

This not only isn't sufficient, it's worthless, as this is true for every integer (n - 1). Since this statement tells us nothing, the answer is either B or E.

S2::

n³ + 2n² + n = n(n² + 2n + 1) = n(n+1)²

If this is a multiple of 3, then either n or (n+1) is a multiple of 3.

If n is a multiple of 3, note that (n - 3) is also a multiple of 3. Since (n - 1) = (n - 3) + 2, (n - 1) is not a multiple of 3: it is 2 greater than a multiple of 3, so its remainder when divided by 3 will be 2.

If (n + 1) is a multiple of 3, so is (n + 1) - 3, or (n - 2). Since (n - 1) = (n - 2) + 1, (n - 1) isn't a multiple of 3: it is 1 greater than a multiple of 3, so its remainder when divided by 3 will be 1.

In either case, (n-1) isn't a multiple of 3, so statement 2 is sufficient.
Join the discussion