BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Movie Screens in Washington County

Expert replies
by komal » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:47 pm
In Washington County, attendance at the movies is just large enough for the cinema operators to make modest profits. The size of the county's population is stable and is not expected to increase much. Yet there are investors ready to double the number of movie screens in the county within five years, and they are predicting solid profits both for themselves and for the established cinema operators.

Which of the following, if true about Washington County, most helps to provide a justification for the investors'
prediction?

(A) Over the next ten years, people in their teenage years, the prime moviegoing age, will be a rapidly growing
proportion of the county's population.

(8) As distinct from the existing cinemas, most of the cinemas being planned would be located in downtown
areas, in hopes of stimulating an economic revitalization of those areas.

(C) Spending on video purchases, as well as spending on video rentals, has been increasing modestly each
year for the past ten years.

(0) The average number of screens per cinema is lower among existing cinemas than it is among cinemas still
in the planning stages.

(E) The sale of snacks and drinks in cinemas accounts for a steadily growing share of most cinema operators'
profits

OA A
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by money9111 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:59 pm
A because it offers a suggestion as to how cinema traffic could increase with a steady population... thus increasing profits
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants

Join the discussion

by mgmt_gmat » Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:23 am
IMO (E)..

because A states the increase in population without giving any reason.
Join the discussion

by KICKGMATASS123 » Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:35 am
mgmt_gmat wrote:IMO (E)..

because A states the increase in population without giving any reason.
IMO E as well. They state that the population increases but then is the population guarenteed to go to the movies to account for increase in revenue?
Join the discussion

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:40 am
A- Correct, it is a logical assumption to assume that if there are more people that fall into the demographic most likely to go to the movies then that would result in more profits for the theatre

B- This has nothing to do with anything

C- This would weaken the conclusion instead of strengthening it

D- This is irrelevant. This addresses neither the expectations for increased profits nor the expectation that the population will remain steady

E- Snacks have nothing to do with the investors expecting adding more screens to the cinema to be profitable. In order for this to be the correct answer, the stimulus would have had to say something like "the investors are going to invest in a variety of new high priced snacks that have been successful in other counties".
https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-retake-o ... 51414.html

Brandon Dorsey
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Buy any Veritas Prep book(s) and receive access to 5 Practice Cats for free! Learn More.
Join the discussion

by money9111 » Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:14 pm
it's asking "if statement ___ were true... what would justify the prediction?" only A accomplishes this
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants

Join the discussion

by vijay_venky » Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:45 am
One more for A
And it also addresses the profits of the established cinemas predicted by the investors, so easily the best of the lot.
Join the discussion

by analyst218 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:00 am
E is out of scope.
only A explains how the increase in revenue would be possible with a steady population.
The only explanation would be change in the proportion of population.
5 out of 10 go to movies.
in next few yrs, 9 out of 10 will go to movies. --> increased revenue.
Join the discussion

by paddle_sweep » Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:45 pm
[spoiler]'A'[/spoiler], since the qn indicates a 'solid profit' for established cinemas also.
Join the discussion

by Singh Sanjeev » Sun Jan 24, 2016 6:10 pm
Osirus@VeritasPrep wrote:A- Correct, it is a logical assumption to assume that if there are more people that fall into the demographic most likely to go to the movies then that would result in more profits for the theatre

B- This has nothing to do with anything

C- This would weaken the conclusion instead of strengthening it

D- This is irrelevant. This addresses neither the expectations for increased profits nor the expectation that the population will remain steady

E- Snacks have nothing to do with the investors expecting adding more screens to the cinema to be profitable. In order for this to be the correct answer, the stimulus would have had to say something like "the investors are going to invest in a variety of new high priced snacks that have been successful in other counties".
Hi What is the reason that option C is a weakener. In my understanding, since video games are becoming costly, people will turn to cinema for entertainment.
Please explain.
Join the discussion

by Sanghamitra M » Fri Feb 26, 2016 3:04 am
answer is A. Even though population is not increasing, option A saying population of movie going crowd is increasing.
Join the discussion