• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to $200 Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5 Day FREE Trial Study Smarter, Not Harder Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Veritas GMAT Class Experience Lesson 1 Live Free Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Reach higher with Artificial Intelligence. Guaranteed Now free for 30 days Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Trial & Practice Exam BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Practice Test & Review How would you score if you took the GMAT Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 1 Hour Free BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Get 300+ Practice Questions 25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Magoosh Study with Magoosh GMAT prep Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5-Day Free Trial 5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant Available with Beat the GMAT members only code ## Most of This topic has 10 member replies morningjava Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Joined 20 Jun 2007 Posted: 5 messages #### Most of Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:23 pm Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute$330 a year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year. A. year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying$7 per year
B. year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per year C. year, compared to the previously$7 per year, toward the cost of higher education
D. year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the $7 per year required previously E. year as opposed to the$7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education

What do you think is the clues to be logical to approach to the best answer?
Can you describe every factor to think of in terms of grammatical, semantic, and constructive points?

arunjithp Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Joined
02 Feb 2007
Posted:
16 messages
Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:15 pm
btw.. what is the OA ?

drhomler Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
03 May 2007
Posted:
141 messages
Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:00 am
A. year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year -A makes it sound like higher education was previously B. year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid$7 per year -for which is awkward construction and unidiomatic

C. year, compared to the previously $7 per year, toward the cost of higher education -previously is incorrectly modifying$7

D. year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the $7 per year required previously -D is the best choice-required "previously" is fine because it is an adverb that modifies the verb required-the sentence is concise logical and parallel E. year as opposed to the$7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education -awkward construction with "as opposed to" and the $7 needs to be closer to higher education givemeanid Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 17 Jun 2007 Posted: 277 messages Followed by: 1 members Upvotes: 6 Thu Jun 21, 2007 6:14 am Original makes it sound like 'higher education' was paying$7 per year. So (A) is out.
(B) has awkward 'for which was previously paid'
(C) has awkward 'compared to the previously $7 per year' IMO, (D) ends the sentence dangling although I do not know the exact reason. Ending the sentence with 'required previously' is not sounding right to my ears. I say its (E). sandeepsept5 Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Joined 09 May 2007 Posted: 8 messages Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:41 am I would go for (B). B -> stands crisp, with the meaning unchanged. E, I think, changes the meaning of the original sentence, by saying that the fees was required where in, the original statement says that fees was paid. Please correct me should I be wrong. isisalaska Community Manager Joined 10 Dec 2006 Posted: 363 messages Followed by: 2 members Upvotes: 7 Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:48 am I believe is D. E misplaces "the cost of higher education", this shodul not be at in the end. You need "toward the cost of higher education" right next to teh dollar amount.. _________________ Isis Alaska jrbrown2 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 10 Jun 2007 Posted: 103 messages Upvotes: 2 Test Date: 11/07 Target GMAT Score: 720+ Fri Jun 22, 2007 7:44 pm I'd go with D. For E:$330 a year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education. Doesn't seem parallel to me. You're comparing "$330 a year" to "$7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education". It's obvious that the$330/year is for the cost of higher education but this sentence skews the meaning somewhat.

Choice D makes it known that the $330/year goes toward the cost of higher education and compares that rate to$7/year (also for the cost of ed.) required previously

Joe S Guest
Sat Jun 23, 2007 9:34 am
I agree with jrbrown2's explanation. My vote is D as well.

arunjithp Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Joined
02 Feb 2007
Posted:
16 messages
Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:13 pm
Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying$7 per year.

A. year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year B. year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid$7 per year
C. year, compared to the previously $7 per year, toward the cost of higher education D. year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the$7 per year required previously
E. year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education What do you think is the clues to be logical to approach to the best answer? Can you describe every factor to think of in terms of grammatical, semantic, and constructive points? Logical Approach: There are two questions that needs answer in this sentence: 1. what are they protesting against? 2. Why are they protesting..? Ans1. to protest a law that requires them to contribute$330 a year toward the cost of higher education

Ans2. instead of the $7 per year required previously These two answers are present in D. hopefully Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Joined 12 Jun 2007 Posted: 75 messages Upvotes: 2 Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:54 pm Should it not be "TOWARDS"... My logic was toward the cost of education is wrong... so C E remain... In C Previously$7 is wrong

So (E)

### Top Member

Roland2rule Legendary Member
Joined
30 Aug 2017
Posted:
702 messages
Followed by:
4 members
Wed Nov 08, 2017 11:30 pm
Option A
'year toward the cost of higher education,previously paying $7 per year' 'previous paying$7 per year' this is incomplete phrase it therefore cannot stand on its own.
This option is incorrect.

Option B.
'year toward the cost of higher education for which was previously paid $7 per year' This option is incorrect. 'for which was previously paid$7 per year' this is a grammatically wrong sentence.

Option c.
'year,compared to the previously $7 per year,toward the cost of higher education'. The use of 'compare', in this sentence makes it not suitable for the completion of the sentence. Option D. to contribute$330 a 'year toward the cost of higher education,instead of the $7 per year required previously if we check the two clauses here,they correctly answer why the students are protesting. question 1; what are they protesting? answer: to contribute$330 a year toward the cost of higher education,
question 2; what do they want?
instead of the $7 per year required previously Option E. 'year as oppose to the$7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education'
'as oppose' this makes the sentence grammatically incorrect and it does not follow parallelism.
'cost of higher education' should be at the rear end of the sentence
This option is incorrect.

### Best Conversation Starters

1 lheiannie07 96 topics
2 ardz24 64 topics
3 Roland2rule 63 topics
4 LUANDATO 61 topics
5 M7MBA 50 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

140 posts
2 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

135 posts
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

121 posts
4 Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

114 posts
5 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

111 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts