BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

More and more companies have begun to consume

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Tue Nov 14, 2017 2:19 am
More and more companies have begun to consume less energy by making themselves more efficient. Over time, these efforts could place the United States at the forefront of an emerging global market for cleaner technologies. Such efforts are also essential to tackling the two big energy-related issues of the age: global warming and the dependence on precarious supplies of oil. The federal government should encourage these efforts by providing the necessary incentives, whether as loans, direct grants or targeted tax breaks.

Which of the following, if true, provides the most effective support for the argument?

A. On the average, Canadian companies are more energy efficient than those in the United States.
B. Experts believe that energy efficiency could lower the energy use of the United States to the level of 1995.
C. In the past, government incentives have made advances in energy conservation feasible, especially in the auto industry.
D. The dependence on foreign oil is a greater problem in the present than global warming.
E. The market for cleaner technologies is currently relatively small because of the infrastructure requirements.

Why isn't it Option E?

OA C
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by EconomistGMATTutor » Wed Nov 15, 2017 1:35 pm
The conclusion: The federal government should encourage companies to consume less energy by providing the necessary incentives.
The evidence: These efforts could place the United States at the forefront of an emerging global market for cleaner technologies and could help with the issues of global warming and the dependence on precarious supplies of oil.

Assumption: The government incentives will be effective.

Choice C supports the conclusion by showing that government incentives have made advances in energy conservation possible before. The conclusion, like this choice, is about using less ( conserving) energy.

You've asked about Choice E. How does this strengthen the conclusion? Knowing that the market for clean technologies is small does not help us determine whether the government incentives are a good idea. Perhaps the infrastructure requirements mentioned in this choice will make the government incentives ineffective. Perhaps the market will always be small. This choice does not really deal with the key terms of the argument, including government incentives.

I'm available if you'd like a follow-up.
GMAT Prep From The Economist
We offer 70+ point score improvement money back guarantee.
Our average student improves 98 points.

Image
Join the discussion

by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:12 pm
EconomistGMATTutor wrote:The conclusion: The federal government should encourage companies to consume less energy by providing the necessary incentives.
The evidence: These efforts could place the United States at the forefront of an emerging global market for cleaner technologies and could help with the issues of global warming and the dependence on precarious supplies of oil.

Assumption: The government incentives will be effective.

Choice C supports the conclusion by showing that government incentives have made advances in energy conservation possible before. The conclusion, like this choice, is about using less ( conserving) energy.

You've asked about Choice E. How does this strengthen the conclusion? Knowing that the market for clean technologies is small does not help us determine whether the government incentives are a good idea. Perhaps the infrastructure requirements mentioned in this choice will make the government incentives ineffective. Perhaps the market will always be small. This choice does not really deal with the key terms of the argument, including government incentives.

I'm available if you'd like a follow-up.
Thanks a lot!
Join the discussion