BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

parallel and pronoun issue

Expert replies
by gmatwarroom » Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:35 pm
A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.

(A) that they will, or could,
(B) that they would, or could,
(C) they will be or could
(D) think that they will be or could
(E) think the power stations would or could

I chose answer E but answer seems given as D ... can someone validate this for me?
my reasoning:
A, B, C are not parallel --
"A majority of the international journalists surveyed" -- I see this Subject.
So, "Subject view..." would match with "Subject think..."

Now, between D and E:
in D, it's not clear what "they" is referring to.
E makes it clear by saying "think power station...."

Any input please?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by adthedaddy » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:49 am
Hi,
(D) as answer is correct. (E) cannot be the answer as the correct form will be "think THAT the power stations would BE or could".

A,B,C are not parallel so the remaining answer is (D).
Hope this helps.
"Your time is limited, so don't waste it living someone else's life. Don't be trapped by dogma - which is living with the results of other people's thinking. Don't let the noise of others' opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Everything else is secondary" - Steve Jobs
Join the discussion

by srcc25anu » Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:36 pm
IMO D
View and think are parallel. So that leaves A,B and C out.
Between D and E, i don't think we need to repeat power stations as the only intended referent of THEY is power stations.
Join the discussion

by Tommy Wallach » Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:23 pm
Hey All,

Good discussion here already. Just a bit more detail:
A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.

(A) that they will, or could,
(B) that they would, or could,
(C) they will be or could
(D) think that they will be or could
(E) think the power stations would or could
(A) Missing verb "think" (there's no verb that would require "that"). Commas are weird.
(B) Same as (A), also "Would" is incorrect. "Would" means there's something in the way of them being made safe (I would go to the store, if I had more money...), a meaning that isn't supported here.
(C) Same parallel error as (A).
(D) At first glance, it may look like the pronoun is wrong here, but the structure of the sentence gives it away. The other possible confusing antecedent (international journalists) are already present in this clause, through the parallelism:

...but [A majority of the international journalists] think that they will be or could...

(E) Makes the "would" error. Also, the GMAT uses THAT after the verb "think," though in everyday English it's often elided.

Hope that helps!

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:32 am
Try not to use pronoun ambiguity to eliminate answer choices, because the GMAT is not 100% consistent on this issue. Very occasionally, the GMAT will directly test pronoun ambiguity. More often than not, though, the GMAT will allow seeming ambiguity if the meaning is clear enough.

This question falls into the latter category. It wouldn't make much sense for journalists to be made safe, so "they" must refer to power stations. Now, I personally agree that it would be better not to use the pronoun here! And if we were asked to choose between:
think that they will be or could
think that the power stations will be or could

Clearly, we'd choose the second one. But since E had other grammar issues, we're allowed to ignore pronoun ambiguity in D.

So, always deal with all other grammar issues before looking at pronoun ambiguity! Here are some more posts on the subject:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/declaration- ... tml#539397
https://www.beatthegmat.com/bear-markets ... tml#549435
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1