BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Average again.

Expert replies
by lenagmat » Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:03 am
In a certain company, the average wages of employees in Town A is X, the average wages of employees in Town B is Y. If both types of employees are added together, is the new average salary smaller than (X + Y)/2?

(1) There are more employees in Town A than B
(2) Y-X = 4200
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Anurag@Gurome » Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:15 am
lenagmat wrote:In a certain company, the average wages of employees in Town A is X, the average wages of employees in Town B is Y. If both types of employees are added together, is the new average salary smaller than (X + Y)/2?

(1) There are more employees in Town A than B
(2) Y-X = 4200
Say, number of employees in town A and B are a and b respectively.
Hence, new average salary = (aX + bY)/(a + b)

Statement 1: a > b
Hence, the new average salary is more weighted towards X.
Therefore, if X > Y, then the new average salary will be greater than (X + Y)/2 and vice versa. But we don't know whether X is greater than Y or not.

NOT sufficient

Statement 2: Y = X + 4200
As we don't know the relation between a and b we cannot answer the original question.

NOT sufficient

1 & 2 Together: As a > b and X < Y, the new average salary must be smaller than (X + Y)/2.

SUFFICIENT

The correct answer is C.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by neelgandham » Wed Oct 19, 2011 3:09 am
:mrgreen: I love math :mrgreen: !

Let a and b be the number of employees in town A and town B respectively
Average wages of employees in town A = X
Average wages of employees in town B = Y

Hence, new average salary = (aX + bY)/(a + b)

Question posed :

Is new average salary smaller than (X + Y)/2?
Implies, Is (aX + bY)/(a + b) < (X + Y)/2

=> 2(aX + bY)< (X + Y)(a + b)

=> 2aX + 2bY < aX + bX + aY + bY

=> aX + bY < bX + aY

=> a(X-Y)-b(X-Y) < 0

=> (a-b)*(X-Y) < 0

So the word question is reduced to Is (a-b)*(X-Y) < 0 ?, which is possible only in two cases

i) (a-b)<0 and (X-Y)>0
ii)(a-b)>0 and (X-Y)<0


(1) There are more employees in Town A than B

Implies a > b => (a-b) > 0 but we are not sure of the value of x-y hence insufficient

(2) Y-X = 4200

Implies X-Y = -4200 i.e X-Y < 0 but we are not sure of the value of a-b hence insufficient

[spoiler]Using both the conditions you get X-Y < 0 and (a-b) > 0, resulting in (a-b)*(X-Y) < 0 , Hence Option C[/spoiler]
Anil Gandham
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/
Join the discussion

by Abhishek009 » Wed Oct 19, 2011 6:04 am
lenagmat wrote:In a certain company, the average wages of employees in Town A is X, the average wages of employees in Town B is Y. If both types of employees are added together, is the new average salary smaller than (X + Y)/2?

(1) There are more employees in Town A than B
(2) Y-X = 4200
Average age of employees in Town A & B can be (X + Y)/2 , if the population of both the town were same...

The New average salary smaller than (X + Y)/2 - This suggests that the Population size is not the same...

So either Population in town A > Population in Town B

OR

Population in Town B > Population in Town A...


We can not arrive at a specific solution , so option 1 can not be possible.

Again , from the given statement we can not say Y-X = 4200 , because there is no mention of any figure..

So neither of the given answer choices follows !!!
Abhishek
Join the discussion

by suyashgupta0562 » Wed Nov 02, 2011 8:00 pm
lenagmat wrote:In a certain company, the average wages of employees in Town A is X, the average wages of employees in Town B is Y. If both types of employees are added together, is the new average salary smaller than (X + Y)/2?

(1) There are more employees in Town A than B
(2) Y-X = 4200
Let's assume no of Employees from town A to be a, and no of employees from town B to be b.

Hence,

Total of wages for Town A = aX (No of Employees X Avg. wages)

Total of wages for Town B = bY

Total wages for town A and B = aX + bY

Total no of Employees = a+b

New Average = ( Total Wages of Employees in Town A and B ) / (Total no of Employees in Town A and B)

= (aX+bY) / (a+b)

The stem asks us to check whether,

= (aX+bY) / (a+b) <. (X+Y)/2 - Cross Multiply and apply FOIL

= 2aX + 2bY < aX + aY + bX + bY. - Taking like terms on each side

= 2bY-bY-bX < aY + aX - 2aX

= bY - bX < aY- aX

= b(Y-X) < a(Y-X). - So, if this is true than the New Average is less than ( X + Y ) / 2 )

Statement 1: - There are more Employees i n Town A than in Town B, Hence a > b

If Y- X is positive then b(Y-X) < a(Y-X) holds true.

But if Y-X is negative then b(Y-X) > a ( Y-X) note that the sign flips hence the original inequality we are testing does not hold true

As there are two possible outcomes : Insufficient - Eliminate AD

Statement 2 :- (Y-X) = 4200

This does not tell us about a and b hence : Insufficent : Eliminate B

Both, a > b and Y-X = 4200 and hence positive we can conclude that,

b(Y-X) < a (Y-X)

Correct Answer C [/b]
Join the discussion