Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

mode inequality

Expert replies
by vipulgoyal » Wed May 22, 2013 10:04 pm
In the number line, is r between s and t?
1) | r – s | < | r – t |
2) | r – s | > | s – t |
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Atekihcan » Wed May 22, 2013 10:12 pm
Statement 1: The following two cases are possible,
<----------r----s-----------t--------->
<----------s----r-----------t--------->

So, r may or may not lie between s and t.
So, statement 1 is not sufficient.

Statement 2: This means distance between r and s is greater than the distance between s and t.
So, it is not possible that r is between s and t.
So, statement 2 is sufficient.

Answer : B
Join the discussion

by vipulgoyal » Wed May 22, 2013 10:22 pm
thanks very well explained just wondering is there any algebric way to check if we havent misseed any possible positions of r,s,t on number line , I mean by opening mode with real values or abslute values
Join the discussion

by Atekihcan » Wed May 22, 2013 10:29 pm
vipulgoyal wrote:thanks very well explained just wondering is there any algebric way to check if we havent misseed any possible positions of r,s,t on number line , I mean by opening mode with real values or abslute values
Off course there is.
But absolute value problems are better solved by interpreting them as the distances on the number line. That way it is much easier and less time consuming than algebraic method.

And for this particular problem, algebraic approach, i.e. opening absolute value brackets and considering all possible scenarios separately will be a mess. (Just thinking of the scenario sends shivers down my spine :oops: )
Join the discussion

by vipulgoyal » Wed May 22, 2013 10:42 pm
hi atekihcan following same way as shown by you, just wanted to make sure the ans of the following inequality is C
Whether S is in between R and T?
(1) | R – T | > | R - S |
(2) | R – T | > | T - S |
Join the discussion

by Atekihcan » Wed May 22, 2013 10:56 pm
vipulgoyal wrote:hi atekihcan following same way as shown by you, just wanted to make sure the ans of the following inequality is C
Whether S is in between R and T?
(1) | R – T | > | R - S |
(2) | R – T | > | T - S |
Yes, indeed.

For statement 1, following scenarios are possible...
<--------r----s---------t--------->
<----s---r--------------t--------->


For statement 2, following scenarios are possible...
<--------r----------s---t--------->
<--------r--------------t---s----->

Both statements together, distance between r and t is greater than both the distances between r and s and s and t. So, s must be between r and t.

So, both statements together is sufficient.

Answer : C
Join the discussion