BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

One million year old skull ...

Expert replies
by II » Mon Nov 24, 2008 5:51 pm
See attached question from GMATPrep.

I am going through each of the answer choices trying to highlight what is wrong or right (for the correct choice) with the answer choices:

(A) Issue with original sentence:
• Idiom: “associated both” (incorrect) Vs “associated with” (correct)
• Distorts meaning of original sentence: “bear traits associated both with Homo erectus and, in addition, Homo sapiens has been found in the …”
• “has been found” – what has been found ? this looks as if it is referring to Homo Sapiens … in which case it should be “have been found”.

(B)
• Idiom: associated with should be used
• “have been found” – whats been found ? the skull. So this should be “has been found”.

(C)
• Correct use of idiom “associated with”
• “has been found” correctly refers to the “million year old skull”.

(D)
this sounds wrong to my ear ... but what grammatical rule is being broken here ?

(E)
• “have been found” should be “has been found”
dont understand what is wrong with "which indicates" ... why is "indicating" better than "which indicates" ? Is this a parallelism issue ---> bearing, indicating ?

Thanks for your input.
II
Attachments
one million yr old skull.jpg
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Tryingmybest » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:03 pm
IMO C

Correct use of idiom. Has been correctly refers to skull .
Join the discussion

by II » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:18 pm
Yes. C is the correct answer ... please see my comments highlighted in bold. I want to fully understand why the rest of the answer choices were wrong.

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by Tryingmybest » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:30 pm
Choice D doesnt sound right to me. Unable to spot an error.It is awkward.

But E is clearly wrong . Which refers to a place instead of Skull.

(which or that refers to the Previous word)
Join the discussion

by II » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:39 pm
(D)
this sounds wrong to my ear ... but what grammatical rule is being broken here ?

(E)
• “have been found” should be “has been found”

dont understand what is wrong with "which indicates" ... why is "indicating" better than "which indicates" ? Is this a parallelism issue ---> bearing, indicating ?
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:45 am
in D, the second use of and is wrong and kinda changes the meaning.

in E, which incorrectly refers to Eritrea.
Join the discussion

by iamcste » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:03 am
II wrote:(D)
this sounds wrong to my ear ... but what grammatical rule is being broken here ?

Your ears are right!

And is used to join 2 independent clauses

"found in the Afar region of XXX " is no way an independent clause. We do not have a subject. e,g what is found cant be answered.

Inclusion of And makes earlier part of sentence incomplete...You can see that there is no verb. "XXX bearing traits associated with YYY"



In this case, And distributes an independent clauses into 2 parts.


(E)
• “have been found” should be “has been found”

dont understand what is wrong with "which indicates" ... why is "indicating" better than "which indicates" ? Is this a parallelism issue ---> bearing, indicating ?


which , as a noun modifer, incorrectly modifies "Eritria"

This changes the meaning, Did "Eritria" indicate anything

Join the discussion

by II » Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:23 pm
iamcste ... you are King ! :-) Great explanations !
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Sat Nov 29, 2008 7:25 pm
IMO:E
Have been modify for both Homo ...homo, not for the skull
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1