BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

PHOTO

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 1 times

PHOTO

by sogmat » Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:14 pm
Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that something emits hitting film, must in some obvious sense be true. But because it could always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. Therefore, nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.
Which one of the following is an assumption that would permit the conclusion above to be properly drawn?
(A) Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth cannot furnish definitive proof.
(B) The whole truth cannot be known.
(C) It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense.
(D) It is possible to use a photograph as corroborative evidence if there is additional evidence establishing the truth about the scene photographed.
(E) If something is being photographed, then it is possible to prove definitively the truth about it.

OA -A
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

by delhiboy1979 » Tue Apr 14, 2009 11:12 pm
Between A and D I pick A because D goes partly out of scope with using photographs as corroborative evidence.
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:390

Conclusion question, can assume there is no flaw in argument

by mharv » Tue Apr 14, 2009 11:41 pm
A would be correct

The Premise is the photo cannot express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. The conclusion based on this premise makes sense that whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the truth, cannot furnish definitive proof.

B is wrong

C is wrong

D is irrelevant as there is no mention about how the photo used as evidence and additional factors are being introduced which suggest it as a causal flaw. There is no flaw, the question is asking for the conclusion

E is completely opposite of what is being said in paragraph about photography. "There is no truth about it."
Regards,
Arvind
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 12 times

Re: Conclusion question, can assume there is no flaw in argu

by piyush_nitt » Tue Apr 14, 2009 11:53 pm
mharv wrote:A would be correct

The Premise is the photo cannot express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. The conclusion based on this premise makes sense that whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the truth, cannot furnish definitive proof.

B is wrong

C is wrong

D is irrelevant as there is no mention about how the photo used as evidence and additional factors are being introduced which suggest it as a causal flaw. There is no flaw, the question is asking for the conclusion

E is completely opposite of what is being said in paragraph about photography. "There is no truth about it."
Why C is wrong?

If we negate C then Conclusion gets weakened.

C. It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense

Negation: It is possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense

and conclusion : Therefore, nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.

Am I missing something here?

Cheers
Piyush
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 160
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 7:10 pm
Thanked: 10 times
GMAT Score:600

Re: Conclusion question, can assume there is no flaw in argu

by dendude » Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:35 am
piyush_nitt wrote: Why C is wrong?

If we negate C then Conclusion gets weakened.

C. It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense

Negation: It is possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense

and conclusion : Therefore, nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.

Am I missing something here?

Cheers
Piyush
C is wrong because it is too extreme and the same reason holds good for B.
Reasoning for D and E has already been provided above.

The conclusion states, nothing can ever be definitely proved with a photograph.
The word definitive is key here.
A correctly follows this track to say that if something is false, because it does not express the whole truth, then it cannot be treated as definitive proof. It hence ties Stmt#2 and Stmt#3 in the argument, together.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:33 am
Thanked: 12 times
Followed by:1 members

by krisraam » Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:56 am
IMO A.

The conclusion "Nothing can definitely be proven with a photograph" is properly drawn if we assume that "The false part a photograph has is enough that it can;t form a definitive proof"

Thanks
Raama
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 119
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:16 pm
Thanked: 9 times
GMAT Score:730

by mikeCoolBoy » Thu Apr 16, 2009 4:55 am
IMO C

because it could always have been made to show things differently than it does therefore nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.

from my point of view if we negate C the argument falls apart [/b]
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:00 am

by samanthaJ79 » Sun May 15, 2016 4:46 am
I will go with option A
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1