BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

inequality 6

Expert replies
by Gurpinder » Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:32 pm
how do we go from:

1 > 1 - ab > 0

to

1>ab

thanks all
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Rahul@gurome » Wed Sep 01, 2010 6:01 pm
Gurpinder wrote:how do we go from:

1 > 1 - ab > 0

to

1>ab

thanks all
Subtracting 1, we get 0 > -ab > -1
Divide by -1, it will change the sign of inequality: 0 < ab < 1
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by Gurpinder » Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:12 am
Rahul@gurome wrote:
Gurpinder wrote:how do we go from:

1 > 1 - ab > 0

to

1>ab

thanks all
Subtracting 1, we get 0 > -ab > -1
Divide by -1, it will change the sign of inequality: 0 < ab < 1
Hey Rahul,

So once we have come at 0 < ab < 1, can we drop the "0<" part and take away the rest of the equation or do we have to keep it?

Thanks
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:54 am
Gurpinder wrote: Hey Rahul,

So once we have come at 0 < ab < 1, can we drop the "0<" part and take away the rest of the equation or do we have to keep it?

Thanks
If we drop the "0<" part then the meaning of the inequality changes as it becomes ab < 1 and product of ab can be any value less than 1.
But 0 < ab < 1 implies value of ab will be positive as it lies between 0 and 1.
Does that help?
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by Gurpinder » Thu Sep 02, 2010 7:50 am
Rahul@gurome wrote:
Gurpinder wrote: Hey Rahul,

So once we have come at 0 < ab < 1, can we drop the "0<" part and take away the rest of the equation or do we have to keep it?

Thanks
If we drop the "0<" part then the meaning of the inequality changes as it becomes ab < 1 and product of ab can be any value less than 1.
But 0 < ab < 1 implies value of ab will be positive as it lies between 0 and 1.
Does that help?
Alright!

So then,
1 > 1 - ab > 0 ------> 1>ab is wrong then?

it should be 1>ab>0 right??

This was my initial confusion actually.

Thanks,
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion