BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Minimize X

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by agoyal2 » Thu May 14, 2009 9:02 pm
x ≥y/3 and y + z ≥ 65

So, since X is an integer, Y will be multiple of 3. Taking Y=3, x could be anything >= 1.

Y=3 also satisfies the second equation if Z is anything >= 62

So from the answer choices, it looks like it will be c

Somehow, I don't like my solution. Am I missing something here?
Join the discussion

by dtweah » Fri May 15, 2009 2:03 am
If x,y,z are positive integers, x ≥y/3 , y ≥ z/5, and y+z ≥ 65 then the smallest possible value of x is
(a) 6
(b) 5
(c) 2
(d) 4
(e) 3

Sorry Guys. I left out y ≥ z/5 and just realized that.
Join the discussion

by avenus » Fri May 15, 2009 3:24 am
y>z/5 --> 5y - z>0
Combinining with y + z > 65:
6y > 65 --> y > 11
Since x>y/3, we have x> 4

Answer is D
Join the discussion

by avenus » Fri May 15, 2009 3:45 am
agoyal2 wrote:x>y/3 and y + z > 65

So, since X is an integer, Y will be multiple of 3. Taking Y=3, x could be anything >= 1.
watch out. y does not need to be a multiple of 3. It would if the first inequality was an equality (x = y/3) but not in this case
Join the discussion

by agoyal2 » Fri May 15, 2009 7:13 am
Thanks avenus, I see your point...
Join the discussion