Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Military Academy problem

Expert replies

by Frankenstein » Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:07 pm
@Atul,
Got ur point now. I didn't notice 'resurgence' in green. I just took for granted that patriotism,tuition cost and gerund with their respective modifiers are parallel as Ashish has clearly explained.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:19 am
atulmangal wrote: Brother, i agree that gerunds are noun but my point was A GERUND can not be parallel to a STANDARD NOUN...and m sure about this concept.
Well, I am not so sure about this. Why can't gerunds be parallel to standard nouns?
atulmangal wrote: Ashish suggested a different reasoning that the parallelism is set between adjectives not between NOUNS (as nicksworth said)...his point seems good to me!!!
Ashish and me, both are saying the same thing - that the parallelism is essentially between three nouns and their associated modifiers. (with a slight disagreement of course on resurgence and patriotism.)
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:31 am
niksworth wrote:
atulmangal wrote: Brother, i agree that gerunds are noun but my point was A GERUND can not be parallel to a STANDARD NOUN...and m sure about this concept.
Well, I am not so sure about this. Why can't gerunds be parallel to standard nouns?
atulmangal wrote: Ashish suggested a different reasoning that the parallelism is set between adjectives not between NOUNS (as nicksworth said)...his point seems good to me!!!
Ashish and me, both are saying the same thing - that the parallelism is essentially between three nouns and their associated modifiers. (with a slight disagreement of course on resurgence and patriotism.)
parallelism b/w noun and adjective gonna be two different things here, as i said earlier m 100% confident on the concept that an -ing can not be parallel to standard noun but "the -ing of" can be parallel to a standard noun.
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:38 am
atulmangal wrote: parallelism b/w noun and adjective gonna be two different things here, as i said earlier m 100% confident on the concept that an -ing can not be parallel to standard noun but "the -ing of" can be parallel to a standard noun.
Ok, I understood your doubt. You say that
-ing can not be parallel to standard noun but "the -ing of" can be parallel to a standard noun.


Tell me something.
1) Can "the -ing by" be parallel to a standard noun?
2) Also, what is the difference between "the -ing of" and "the -ing by"?
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:13 pm
@nicksworth
Tell me something.
1) Can "the -ing by" be parallel to a standard noun?
2) Also, what is the difference between "the -ing of" and "the -ing by"?
here, You pointed out a really cool thing brother...as i said i'm sure about "the -ing of" parallelism to a standard noun i believe, "the -ing by" can also be parallel to a standard noun, as both "of" and "by" are prepositions...finally if we apply this understanding in this same question then that means the parallelism in Op A is set b/w NOUNS not ADJECTIVES right.

Possible long-term consequences of the "greenhouse effect," the gradual warming of the Earth's climate, include melting of the polar ice caps and a rise in sea level.

In this sentence "-ing of" is parallel to "standard noun"
Join the discussion