BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Military Academy problem

Expert replies

by Frankenstein » Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:07 pm
@Atul,
Got ur point now. I didn't notice 'resurgence' in green. I just took for granted that patriotism,tuition cost and gerund with their respective modifiers are parallel as Ashish has clearly explained.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:19 am
atulmangal wrote: Brother, i agree that gerunds are noun but my point was A GERUND can not be parallel to a STANDARD NOUN...and m sure about this concept.
Well, I am not so sure about this. Why can't gerunds be parallel to standard nouns?
atulmangal wrote: Ashish suggested a different reasoning that the parallelism is set between adjectives not between NOUNS (as nicksworth said)...his point seems good to me!!!
Ashish and me, both are saying the same thing - that the parallelism is essentially between three nouns and their associated modifiers. (with a slight disagreement of course on resurgence and patriotism.)
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:31 am
niksworth wrote:
atulmangal wrote: Brother, i agree that gerunds are noun but my point was A GERUND can not be parallel to a STANDARD NOUN...and m sure about this concept.
Well, I am not so sure about this. Why can't gerunds be parallel to standard nouns?
atulmangal wrote: Ashish suggested a different reasoning that the parallelism is set between adjectives not between NOUNS (as nicksworth said)...his point seems good to me!!!
Ashish and me, both are saying the same thing - that the parallelism is essentially between three nouns and their associated modifiers. (with a slight disagreement of course on resurgence and patriotism.)
parallelism b/w noun and adjective gonna be two different things here, as i said earlier m 100% confident on the concept that an -ing can not be parallel to standard noun but "the -ing of" can be parallel to a standard noun.
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:38 am
atulmangal wrote: parallelism b/w noun and adjective gonna be two different things here, as i said earlier m 100% confident on the concept that an -ing can not be parallel to standard noun but "the -ing of" can be parallel to a standard noun.
Ok, I understood your doubt. You say that
-ing can not be parallel to standard noun but "the -ing of" can be parallel to a standard noun.


Tell me something.
1) Can "the -ing by" be parallel to a standard noun?
2) Also, what is the difference between "the -ing of" and "the -ing by"?
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:13 pm
@nicksworth
Tell me something.
1) Can "the -ing by" be parallel to a standard noun?
2) Also, what is the difference between "the -ing of" and "the -ing by"?
here, You pointed out a really cool thing brother...as i said i'm sure about "the -ing of" parallelism to a standard noun i believe, "the -ing by" can also be parallel to a standard noun, as both "of" and "by" are prepositions...finally if we apply this understanding in this same question then that means the parallelism in Op A is set b/w NOUNS not ADJECTIVES right.

Possible long-term consequences of the "greenhouse effect," the gradual warming of the Earth's climate, include melting of the polar ice caps and a rise in sea level.

In this sentence "-ing of" is parallel to "standard noun"
Join the discussion