BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

MGMAT

Expert replies
by 4meonly » Sat Jan 31, 2009 2:23 am
The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by predictions of slow economic growth in the coming year. However, those predictions would not have affected the employment rate if it had not been for the lack of capital reserves of major industries. So if major industries increase their capital reserves, the employment rate will not decline in the future.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the validity of the argument above?

Major industry foresaw the drop in employment.
Some major industries had appreciable capital reserves.
An increase in labor costs could adversely affect the employment rate.
The government could pass legislation mandating that major industries set aside a fixed amount as capital reserves every year.
The drop in the employment rate was more severe this year than last.

OA C
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by umaa » Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:40 am
I'm little confused between B and C.
Join the discussion

by gkammaje » Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:25 am
I think C is the only one that makes sense

The argument states that the employment rate is effected by the lack of capital reserves.
What else would effect the employment rate? An increase is labor costs could result is job loss...hence C
Join the discussion

by frizo » Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:47 am
C has to be the answer.
B says that SOME INDUSTRIES had reserves which means SOME OTHERS may not have had. This makes the ans. choice half wrong. HALF WRONG IS ALWAYS FULLY WRONG. :wink:
Join the discussion

by Brad.C » Fri May 13, 2016 2:24 pm
I also think about answer C
Join the discussion