BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MGMAT

Expert replies
by 4meonly » Sat Jan 31, 2009 2:23 am
The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by predictions of slow economic growth in the coming year. However, those predictions would not have affected the employment rate if it had not been for the lack of capital reserves of major industries. So if major industries increase their capital reserves, the employment rate will not decline in the future.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the validity of the argument above?

Major industry foresaw the drop in employment.
Some major industries had appreciable capital reserves.
An increase in labor costs could adversely affect the employment rate.
The government could pass legislation mandating that major industries set aside a fixed amount as capital reserves every year.
The drop in the employment rate was more severe this year than last.

OA C
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by umaa » Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:40 am
I'm little confused between B and C.
Join the discussion

by gkammaje » Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:25 am
I think C is the only one that makes sense

The argument states that the employment rate is effected by the lack of capital reserves.
What else would effect the employment rate? An increase is labor costs could result is job loss...hence C
Join the discussion

by frizo » Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:47 am
C has to be the answer.
B says that SOME INDUSTRIES had reserves which means SOME OTHERS may not have had. This makes the ans. choice half wrong. HALF WRONG IS ALWAYS FULLY WRONG. :wink:
Join the discussion

by Brad.C » Fri May 13, 2016 2:24 pm
I also think about answer C
Join the discussion