The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned to the sea some 50 million years ago. These thousand-pound herbivores inhabit the warm coastal waters where Americans like to play. Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?
1. Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.
2. All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.
3. Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.
4. The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.
5. Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.
MGMAT
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:05 am
- Location: India
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 9:21 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:1 members
B is the cause that people can rarely recognize
Please share your idea and your reasoning
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:05 am
- Location: India
But why not A ?
(B) In the stimulus, "despite conservation efforts" means someone has initiated conservation efforts, which includes restriction on motorboat.
In (A) " Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin." - so the conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers cannot curb the killing of manatee by toxins.
Please put some light on this reasoning
(B) In the stimulus, "despite conservation efforts" means someone has initiated conservation efforts, which includes restriction on motorboat.
In (A) " Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin." - so the conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers cannot curb the killing of manatee by toxins.
Please put some light on this reasoning
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:01 am
- Location: Windsor
- Thanked: 5 times
- GMAT Score:650
I'm going for C....
The question basically asks you to strengthen to Argument. The argument needs to link the fact that there are lots of man-made efforts and the fact that manitees are still unsafe (despite these efforts).
If people are still unaware (as in choice C), it explains why the manitees are still unsafe...
...Or have I misunderstood something?!?
The question basically asks you to strengthen to Argument. The argument needs to link the fact that there are lots of man-made efforts and the fact that manitees are still unsafe (despite these efforts).
If people are still unaware (as in choice C), it explains why the manitees are still unsafe...
...Or have I misunderstood something?!?
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:54 pm
- Location: Bombay, India
IMO B
It cannot be C coz it only talks about tourists
It cannot be C coz it only talks about tourists
Mission Mba
Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:09 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 6 times
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:33 pm
- Thanked: 5 times
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:57 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
B should be the IMO,
Pls do not add any info from your own side. We have to draw the answer from the points which are stated/implied in the question. Toxins is no where mentioned.
Pls do not add any info from your own side. We have to draw the answer from the points which are stated/implied in the question. Toxins is no where mentioned.
The first sentence states that a manatee is quite rare, and uncommon to America. It goes on to state that it resides in the coastal waters where Americans like to play, possibly a nice location to visit? It sounds like the locals agree with by the local conservation groups arguments, and therefore, they should all be following the rules.
These animals can not feel safe, because... most tourists are unaware of the locals efforts.
In my opinion the major implied premise would be:
"Some tourists are a danger to the manatee"
My Answer: C.
3. Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.
My first post
Thanks everyone.
These animals can not feel safe, because... most tourists are unaware of the locals efforts.
In my opinion the major implied premise would be:
"Some tourists are a danger to the manatee"
My Answer: C.
3. Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.
My first post
Thanks everyone.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 891
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 4:21 am
- Thanked: 27 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:660(
The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned to the sea some 50 million years ago. These thousand-pound herbivores inhabit the warm coastal waters where Americans like to play. Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe.
I dont know WTF is manatee, but it does not affect the logic.
Conclusion: none of these animals can be considered safe.
Despite:
Primise 1: conservation efforts
Primise 2: criminal penalties for harming manatee
Primise 3: overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?
Strengthen the conclusion question.
1. Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.
Conclusion is about NONE OF THESE animals. This answer is about SEVERAL manatees. Very specific. OUT
2. All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.
Conclusion is about NONE OF THESE animals. This answer is about ALL manatees. CORRECT
3. Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.
BS. Primise 3 states the opposite. OUT
4. The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.
So what? It it beyond the scope.
5. Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.
So what? It it beyond the scope.
Answer B
I dont know WTF is manatee, but it does not affect the logic.
Conclusion: none of these animals can be considered safe.
Despite:
Primise 1: conservation efforts
Primise 2: criminal penalties for harming manatee
Primise 3: overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?
Strengthen the conclusion question.
1. Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.
Conclusion is about NONE OF THESE animals. This answer is about SEVERAL manatees. Very specific. OUT
2. All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.
Conclusion is about NONE OF THESE animals. This answer is about ALL manatees. CORRECT
3. Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.
BS. Primise 3 states the opposite. OUT
4. The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.
So what? It it beyond the scope.
5. Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.
So what? It it beyond the scope.
Answer B