BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MGMAT Problem

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by this_time_i_will » Sun Sep 26, 2010 6:26 pm
imo E.

I: a+b<0. this gives many conditions. both a and b being negative, or a is positive and b is negative but |b|>|a|, or a is negative and b is psotive but |a|>|b|.

so insufficent.

II.tells nothing about b. insuffient.

I & II:
both a and b may be negative and it is not possible to know, which one.
Join the discussion

by thirst4edu » Sun Sep 26, 2010 6:35 pm
HPengineer wrote:Is |a| > |b|?

(1) b < -a

(2) a < 0



I am interpreting statement 1 incorrectly... Anyone willing to discuss?
Solving by picking numbers, but would like know algebraic approach for this one.

Is |a| > |b| ?

1) b < -a

if b < 0, a < 0
pick b=-2, a = -1
-2 < -(-1) --> -2<1
|a| > |b| --> |-1| > |-2| No

pick b=-5, a=-7
-5 < -(-7) --> -5 < 7
|a| > |b| --> |-7| > |-5| Yes

statement one is not sufficient

2) a < 0
For above picked numbers we have already seen that a < 0 is not sufficient.

1) & 2) Again, both statements are not sufficient for the numbers above.

so Answer IMO is E.
"Learning never exhausts the mind."
--Leonardo da Vinci
Join the discussion

by HPengineer » Sun Sep 26, 2010 9:19 pm
THe first statement is still getting me..

If B is less then a negative number doesn't that mean that B itself must be negative??

(1) b < -a
Join the discussion

by thirst4edu » Sun Sep 26, 2010 9:29 pm
HPengineer wrote:THe first statement is still getting me..

If B is less then a negative number doesn't that mean that B itself must be negative??

(1) b < -a
Not necessary. If b=1 and a=-2
Inequality b < -a is still true 1<-(-2) i.e. 1<2
"Learning never exhausts the mind."
--Leonardo da Vinci
Join the discussion

by HPengineer » Sun Sep 26, 2010 10:00 pm
So they are not saying A is negative but merely that there is a negative sign in front of A?

So these are the two possible scenarios for the value of A based off their statement? - (A) and -(-A)
Join the discussion

by hi.itz.mani » Sun Sep 26, 2010 11:16 pm
|a| >|b|

can be interpreted as

if a > 0 and b > 0 ==> a > b

if a < 0 and b > 0 ==> -a > b

if a > 0 and b < 0 ==> a > -b

if a < 0 and b < 0 ==> -a > - b

so to interpret the question we need to always know the relative value of a and b wrt 0

1 b < -a doesn't tell anything about value of b and a wrt 0 .... hence insufficient
2 a < 0 doesn't tell anything about value of b wrt 0 .... hence insufficient

joining 1 and 2 we still don't know anything about value of b hence both together also insufficient. This leaves us with E.
Join the discussion