Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

mgmat inequalities

Expert replies
by resilient » Fri May 02, 2008 11:53 pm
Is |x| <1> 0



qa is c
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: mgmat inequalities

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sat May 03, 2008 11:48 am
resilient wrote:Is |x| <1> 0


Please repost and make sure you click the "disable HTM in this post" box underneath the text window.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

pc problem mgmat inequalities

by resilient » Sat May 03, 2008 2:33 pm
Is |x| < 1 ?

(1) |x + 1| = 2|x – 1|

(2) |x – 3| > 0



qa is c
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion

by zacharyz » Wed May 07, 2008 2:55 pm
Here's what I have so far:

Question is asking - is -1 < x < 1

Let's look at statement 2:
|x - 3| > 0
This doesn't tell you anything except that x DOES NOT EQUAL 3. For any other value, you can subtract three, take the absolute value and it is positive. 3 does not work because it says 3 - 3 = 0 > 0 not true.
This is insufficient (can be between -1 and 1 or can be higher)

Statement 1:
Let's look at values of x greater than 1 (because the second part of the statement is x-1, so I want to keep this expression positive).
You get:
x + 1 = 2x - 2 rearrange
3 = x This is one answer. And now you know that |x| is not less than 1

You need to find another value of x

This is where I actually failed. I could not figure out how to translate the equations to find a second value of x. (just by trial and error, I know that -3 is NOT the other solution, so I know that at least)

How you would set it up is evaluate each option:
x > 1 (all absolute value sections are positive)
1 > x > -1 (first statement is positive and second statement is negative)
x < -1 (all absolute value sections are negative)

Answer:
At this point, I know the answer is either going to be A or C. If A had given a second answer that is not -1 < x < 1, then that is the answer. If A provides an answer that is in that range, then you need statement B to prove that 3 is not the answer, and the second solution proves that -1 < x < 1.

In the interest of time (and already ruling out -3 as an answer), I guessed C, which is the official answer.


Incidentally - the second solution is 1/3. I figured this out a lot later, but could still use someone's help to set up the absolute value equations properly.
Join the discussion

by netigen » Wed May 07, 2008 4:47 pm
Two solutions can be found by equating the abs equation on the RHS by first considering it + and then -

so I soln

x+1 = 2 (+(x-1))
you get x = 3

II soln

x+1 = 2(-(x-1))
x = 1/3

so ans is C

Hope this helps
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Thu May 08, 2008 12:49 am
netigen wrote:Two solutions can be found by equating the abs equation on the RHS by first considering it + and then -

so I soln

x+1 = 2 (+(x-1))
you get x = 3

II soln

x+1 = 2(-(x-1))
x = 1/3

so ans is C

Hope this helps
correct: you can solve any equality with absolute values by letting the absolute value take on the following 2 values:
* the same as the expression within the absolute value bars;
* the opposite of the expression within the absolute value bars.

if you have multiple absolute values, you have to make sure that you get all possible combinations. for instance, if you have the equation 3 + |x| = |y|, there are 4 possible equations:
3 + x = y
3 - x = y
3 - x = -y
3 + x = -y

finally, perhaps the most important point: you have to CHECK THE SOLUTIONS that you find whenever you solve with this method. you're guaranteed to find all the actual solutions, but you may come up with some 'extraneous' solutions (values that you get from the process, but that don't actually solve the equation) as well. those = bad.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by moneyman » Thu May 08, 2008 5:06 am
Hey netigen..great explanation but I have just one doubt..did u try changing the expression of stat(1) on both the sides ?

what I mean is, since its absolution on both sides of stat(1) did you try the following:

-(x+1)=2(-(x-1)) This gives the answer for x=-1. Though subsitituting the value of x=-1 in the expression does not hold true for stat(1). But I am just wondering how to approach the problem.
Maxx
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Thu May 08, 2008 11:17 am
moneyman wrote:Hey netigen..great explanation but I have just one doubt..did u try changing the expression of stat(1) on both the sides ?

what I mean is, since its absolution on both sides of stat(1) did you try the following:

-(x+1)=2(-(x-1)) This gives the answer for x=-1.
nope, it will give x = 3 again. watch the distributing on those negative signs.
or, better yet just cancel them.

if you have an equation with ONLY the two absolute values (one on each side), then there's no point in trying the negative/negative combo, because it's the same as positive/positive: both of them are just saying that the signs of the 2 absolute value expressions are the same.
similarly, there's little point in trying both (expression 1) = -(expression 2) and -(expression 1) = (expression 2); those two are also the same equation in different forms.

if there's other stuff added to the absolute value, though (as in my examples with the extra '3'), then you need to try all the combinations.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion