BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MGMAT Found of Math Fractions | Simplify: (√3/2)-(√3/8)

Expert replies
by mkofron » Sat Nov 05, 2016 4:42 pm
Simplify: (√3/2)−(√3/8)

Why does the answer explanation not use √8 as the common denominator? Is this illegal?


"Treat this as a standard fraction subtraction problem: find common denominators so that you can subtract. Begin by splitting the square root symbols across the numerator and denominator."
Attachments
Found of Math Fraction Problem.PNG
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by melguy » Sat Nov 05, 2016 6:14 pm
In this problem you have to find the LCM like any other fraction problem.

You would make your life difficult if you take the numerical approach. Considering we have to solve the problem in under two minutes we are supposed to find the easiest approach which would be to simply use √8 x √2 giving us √16 (i.e. 4).
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:46 pm
Hi mkofron,

YES - you could use root8 as the common denominator. Did you try to do so? How many math 'steps' did it take you to get to the correct answer (and when you compare that work to the work shown in this explanation, which option looked easier?)?

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by mkofron » Sat Nov 05, 2016 9:12 pm
I did try the root8 method but I could not manipulate the expressions to get to any of the answer choices. :| Which tells me I have a deficiency somewhere....I get the that root16 is quicker but I am also trying to figure out why I can't make the the root8 method work.

Thanks,
Matt
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sun Nov 06, 2016 12:19 pm
Hi Matt,

Could you post a pic/screen capture of your work so that I can see where you got 'stuck?'

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by mkofron » Sun Nov 06, 2016 2:01 pm
Hey Rich,

Thanks for getting back. Here is how I tried to do it.
Image

You can see I made a silly mistake in the denominator (sqrt 18 instead of sqrt 8) and corrected it before I took this photo. I appreciate the help.

Regards,
Matt
Join the discussion

by mkofron » Sun Nov 06, 2016 3:18 pm
OK, I see what I neglected to do. I just needed to get the square root out of the denominator in my step #6. My original answer choice is equivalent to the correct answer just not as simplified.
Join the discussion