BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If (x+y)/z < 0, is x <0? (1) x<y (2)z<0

Expert replies
by phoenixhazard » Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:18 am
This is from official GMAC book.

If (x+y)/z < 0, is x <0?
(1) x<y
(2)z<0


I have the explanation from the book but it doesn't make sense to me. The OA is C. Can you please explain to me in your own words, perhaps that will clarify it.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by clock60 » Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:04 pm
hi phoenixhazard
it is very strange but i got E can you verify text or oa, below my reasoning
if (x+y)/z<0 then for that to be true two cases are possible

x+y>0 and z<0. or also x+y<0 and z>0

to the statements
(1) x<y, no other solving than picking simple answer.
x=1,y=2 x<y, 1+2=3>0 ( here z must be -ve) and x>0 answer no
x=-1,y=2, x<y.-1+2=1>0 ( again z>0) x<0 the ans is yes
insuff
(2) z<0 it means that x+y>0,
again x=1, y=2 1+2=3>0 x=1>0 the answer no
x=-1, y=2 -1+2=1>0 x=-1<0 the answer is yes insuff
both z<0, x+y>0, x=1,y=2-no , x=-1,y=2,yes to me insuff, the only i can derive from here is that y>0 but the value of x depends on...
E to me,
guys help me to find my mistake
Join the discussion

by 5abi » Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:23 pm
e also..

because if z is a negative.... (x+y) > 0 but x could be a negative or a positive depends on the value of x which is unknown
Join the discussion

by phoenixhazard » Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:46 pm
5abi wrote:e also..

because if z is a negative.... (x+y) > 0 but x could be a negative or a positive depends on the value of x which is unknown
Its C in the book.

They explain that if z<0 then it means x+y must be less than 0 to make a number that is positive. I just dont understand how x<y would give you x+y has to be less than 0 since it doesnt!
Join the discussion

by clock60 » Tue Oct 26, 2010 1:00 pm
please check again the whole problem
if z<0 then it means x+y must be less than 0 to make a number that is positive
in the problem we have number that is -ve
(x+y)/z<0
Join the discussion

by 5abi » Tue Oct 26, 2010 1:54 pm
the same can be said for (x+y)/z <0 if z<0 then (x+y) > 0 but there is nothing indicating this as a certainity.
Join the discussion

by goyalsau » Wed Oct 27, 2010 12:37 am
clock60 wrote:hi phoenixhazard
it is very strange but i got E can you verify text or oa, below my reasoning
if (x+y)/z<0 then for that to be true two cases are possible

x+y>0 and z<0. or also x+y<0 and z>0

to the statements
(1) x<y, no other solving than picking simple answer.
x=1,y=2 x<y, 1+2=3>0 ( here z must be -ve) and x>0 answer no
x=-1,y=2, x<y.-1+2=1>0 ( again z>0) x<0 the ans is yes
insuff
(2) z<0 it means that x+y>0,
again x=1, y=2 1+2=3>0 x=1>0 the answer no
x=-1, y=2 -1+2=1>0 x=-1<0 the answer is yes insuff
both z<0, x+y>0, x=1,y=2-no , x=-1,y=2,yes to me insuff, the only i can derive from here is that y>0 but the value of x depends on...
E to me,
guys help me to find my mistake
Even i am surprised How the answer is C, It should be E
Can you post the official explanation..........
I am sure that will Help a lot.........
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------


EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Join the discussion

by raghav89 » Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:23 pm
clock60 wrote:hi phoenixhazard
it is very strange but i got E can you verify text or oa, below my reasoning
if (x+y)/z<0 then for that to be true two cases are possible

x+y>0 and z<0. or also x+y<0 and z>0

to the statements
(1) x<y, no other solving than picking simple answer.
x=1,y=2 x<y, 1+2=3>0 ( here z must be -ve) and x>0 answer no
x=-1,y=2, x<y.-1+2=1>0 ( again z>0) x<0 the ans is yes
insuff
(2) z<0 it means that x+y>0,
again x=1, y=2 1+2=3>0 x=1>0 the answer no
x=-1, y=2 -1+2=1>0 x=-1<0 the answer is yes insuff
both z<0, x+y>0, x=1,y=2-no , x=-1,y=2,yes to me insuff, the only i can derive from here is that y>0 but the value of x depends on...
E to me,
guys help me to find my mistake
Hi

Basically you're given a situation where

x+y/z>0 has to be true because that's the situation for the problem

Now if this is true and y<0

then for it to be applicable to the above given situation

then x + y must be negative

Now you're also told that x<y then the x=-1,y=2 which you mentioned cannot be taken

because it cannot apply to this situation ie

where x + y/z has to be greater than zero (which is given)

Remember the question is asking you for the answer when x + y/z is greater than 0

and when z is negative you cannot take x=-1 and y=2 because then x+y/z is not equal to 0

because that would give you a positive numerator while it has to be negative to
meet the above equation

because z is also negative.

Both cannot be positive because numerator is positive which it cannot be

Both can be negative then x is less than 0
One can be positive and one can be negative (the negative number has to be x because x is the smaller number by statement 1)

So both ways x is less than 0 and so answer is C
Join the discussion

by amit2k9 » Mon Jul 04, 2011 1:29 am
a+b

for z<0 meaning x+y > 0
thus x = -1 y = 2 or x=1 and y = 2.

E it is.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
Join the discussion

by raghav89 » Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:43 am
x and y cannot be both positive because it's given that x plus y by z is less than 0 and z is equal to less than 0

so denominator is negative and you're given that the equation is positive and therefore the numerator must also be negative to make it positive as a whole

if you take x=1 and x=2 it can't be positive hence you cannot take those 2 numbers

Can only take 2 negative numbers or 1 positive and 1 negative

with 2 negatives x is less than zero and with the other we know that x<y so x is negative

either ways x is negative

C is the answer and you can check that on the OG
Join the discussion

by Sanjay2706 » Mon Jul 04, 2011 9:11 pm
I Think OA should be E
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:27 pm
phoenixhazard wrote:This is from official GMAC book.

If (x+y)/z < 0, is x <0?
(1) x<y
(2)z<0


I have the explanation from the book but it doesn't make sense to me. The OA is C. Can you please explain to me in your own words, perhaps that will clarify it.
We know that x+y and z have opposite signs and we are asked whether x is negative. (2) tells us that z <0, so x + y > 0 . Since x < y, x could be positive, negative or 0.

For example (-1 + 2)/-1 < 0 and (1+2)/-1 < 0

The answer for the question above is E. However, if we had been told that (x+y)/z > 0, (1) and (2) would allow us to conclude that x + y <0 and thus x < 0.
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by singalong » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:13 am
The question is wrong. Please refer D41 question of the OG12 guide.the actual questionis as below.

If (x+y)/z > 0, is x <0?
(1) x<y
(2)z<0
Join the discussion

by singalong » Sat Dec 31, 2011 7:17 pm
Could an expert reply to the corrected question please?
Join the discussion

by GmatMathPro » Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:16 pm
singalong wrote:The question is wrong. Please refer D41 question of the OG12 guide.the actual questionis as below.

If (x+y)/z > 0, is x <0?
(1) x<y
(2)z<0
(x+y)/z>0 implies that the quantities (x+y) and z are either both positive or both negative.

Statement 1: x<y. This is clearly insufficient, as it tells us nothing about z, so we can't use the information given in the stem. It could be that x>0 (x=1, y=2, z=1) or x<0 (x=-1, y=2, z=1). INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: z<0. If z<0, then x+y<0. This could be true if x<0 (x=-3, y=1) or x>0 (y=-3, x=1). INSUFFICIENT.

Statements 1&2: We know that x+y<0 and x<y or x-y<0. When we have two inequalities with the inequality symbol pointing in the same direction, we can add the left and right sides to produce a new, true inequality: Adding x+y<0 and x-y<0 gives 2x<0, which implies that x<0. SUFFICIENT.

Ans: C
Pete Ackley
GMAT Math Pro
Free Online Tutoring Trial
Join the discussion