BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MGMAT CR Question

Expert replies
by spetznaz » Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:32 am
The Action-Packed Gaming Company, based on the success of the previous season's video game featuring the character Sam Li, of the popular Fist of Awe series of martial arts movies, developed for the current season a similar martial arts game featuring a new character who is also a martial arts master. The new game had improved 3-D graphics, enhanced multiplayer capability, and dozens of new martial arts moves developed by real-life masters. However, marketing surveys showed that teenagers were uninterested in this new game, and the game sold very poorly.

The passage implies that an explanation for the failure of the new game is based on doubt regarding which of the following assumptions?


a) Teenagers make purchasing decisions based on the technological merits of video games, not the name recognition of the games' main characters.


b) Buyers of video games prefer to purchase games based on popular movies.


c) The Fist of Awe series of movies was extremely popular with teenagers who regularly purchase video games.


d) Technological improvement from one video game to the next does not guarantee a corresponding increase in sales.


e) The successful video game may have benefited from advertising associated with the Fist of Awe movies, a benefit the failed video game did not have.

OA : a

Experts please enlighten :-). What should be the best approach to solve such question within 2 minutes? I found the wordings of the question stem to be confusing !
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by [email protected] » Tue Jul 22, 2014 2:27 pm
Hi spetznaz,

This is an example of an inference question; to answer it, we need to understand the "facts" listed in the prompt, then find an answer that logically extends from those facts.

The Facts:
-Last season, a gaming company created a video game featuring a martial arts character named Sam Li (who is also in a popular series of martial arts movies).
-This Sam Li game was SUCCESSFUL (implying that it sold many copies).
-For the current season, the company is created a similar game with a NEW martial arts character.
-This new game had better graphics, multiplayer capability and dozens of new martial arts moves.
-This new game was NOT popular with TEENAGERS and the game sold poorly.

We're essentially asked to explain why this new same sold poorly; the designers of the game had an assumption about the game that was wrong - what was it?

The Logic:
The two games were both about martial artist characters. The older game was based on a popular character from a popular series of movies, while the newer game was based on a new character (and NOT on the movies). The newer game was technologically "better" than the old game. With this information, I have to assume that the older game sold better because of the popular character and the popular movies that it was based on. When the designers made a new game without the popular character (and the popular movie tie-in), sales dropped. The company made a mistake by assuming that a newer, higher-technology game was what the buyers (note: TEENAGERS) wanted. The answer that matches is A.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jul 24, 2014 2:35 am
The question stem asks for the manufacturer's assumption.
Thus, we can rephrase the passage and the question stem as follows:
The Action-Packed Gaming Company, based on the success of the previous season's video game featuring the character Sam Li, of the popular Fist of Awe series of martial arts movies, developed for the current season a similar martial arts game featuring a new character who is also a martial arts master. The new game had improved 3-D graphics, enhanced multiplayer capability, and dozens of new martial arts moves developed by real-life masters. The manufacturer predicts that the new game will be even more successful than the previous season's game.

The manufacturer's prediction depends on which of the following assumptions?
The assumption is WHAT MUST BE TRUE for the conclusion to be valid.

Answer choice A:
For the new game to succeed, IT MUST BE TRUE that teenagers make purchasing decisions based on the technological merits of video games, not the name recognition of the games' main characters.
Yes: if name recognition is important, then the new game will not succeed, since its main character lacks name recognition.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion