Mgmat cat qn: Intresting question

This topic has expert replies

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:49 am
technically, it is possible to take the "product of all numbers in a set" if the set has one number in it, just as it's possible to take the "sum of all numbers in a set" if the set has only one number in it.
in either of these two cases, the "product" or "sum" in question is just ... the one number that's there. this is a totally legitimate mathematical construction.

on the other hand, on the gmat you will not have to deal with this sort of thing, i don't think. therefore, if this is our (mgmat) question, i'll try to have it changed so that it's more in line with the usual standards of the test (i.e., no "trick wordings" like this one).

in any case, it's clear that the intention of the problem is to get the student to realize that the negative solution is not ok (since the "√" sign always refers to the positive square root of a number). if this is our problem, i'll think of a less tricky way to phrase the problem so that this purpose is preserved.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Fri Aug 06, 2010 8:14 am
lunarpower wrote: in any case, it's clear that the intention of the problem is to get the student to realize that the negative solution is not ok (since the "√" sign always refers to the positive square root of a number). if this is our problem, i'll think of a less tricky way to phrase the problem so that this purpose is preserved.
Does the question actually have the √ sign in it? That's why I kept asking if the question had been accurately reproduced.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 416
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:08 am
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by gmatrant » Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:46 pm
Is there a difference between raising the expression as: X^1/2 and sqrt(x).
I am assuming that both are same. So why would the original post be wrong if it read x^1/2 and not sqrt(x)

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Fri Aug 06, 2010 10:46 pm
gmatrant wrote:Is there a difference between raising the expression as: X^1/2 and sqrt(x).
I am assuming that both are same. So why would the original post be wrong if it read x^1/2 and not sqrt(x)
You are correct, but in either case, only positive root is considered. But, that never means that the negative root doesn't exist. What's making this question ambiguous is the silly trap of expecting us to consider the set of all solutions to be a singleton. Moreover, the answer choices presented are not in order. I doubt if it's an MGMAT question.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1460
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:28 am
Thanked: 135 times
Followed by:7 members

by selango » Fri Aug 06, 2010 11:37 pm
Each number has 2 square roots. However, the notation sqrt(x) represents the principal square root which is always positive. To represent the other (negative) square root, the notation is -sqrt(x).

Is the above statement correct?

This means sqrt(4)=2 and -sqrt(4)=-2
--Anand--

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Sat Aug 07, 2010 12:26 am
selango wrote:Each number has 2 square roots. However, the notation sqrt(x) represents the principal square root which is always positive. To represent the other (negative) square root, the notation is -sqrt(x).

Is the above statement correct?

This means sqrt(4)=2 and -sqrt(4)=-2
Yes, correct

If x^2 = y, then x = ±√y, just because we don't know x. But if (-4) ^2 = 16, then √16 = -4, which should not be taken as 4 = -√16; and if (4) ^2 = 16, then √16 = 4 as we can see the numbers in both sides. But, √16 with no side information is taken as 4 only.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Sat Aug 07, 2010 3:50 am
i looked in our database. this question is ours, but it's currently deactivated -- i.e., it's not active in the CAT pool, so you shouldn't have seen it while you were taking the exam.

the only thing i can't see is the date on which the problem was deactivated. this thread is dated last week, which is a bit surprising -- i don't think that we've actually deactivated any questions in the last week -- but i can check with other members of the CAT problem committee.

in any case, i'll just reiterate the two things that i already said:
(1) the wording in this problem is still totally legitimate, from a mathematical standpoint. the "product of all numbers in a set" is perfectly well defined when the set contains only 1 number; the "product" is just that number.
HOWEVER,
(2) this problem is problematic, in that it's not representative of what has historically appeared on the exam. to date, i haven't seen a wording as "tricky" as this one.

--

incidentally, the parentheses in the word "solution(s)" are a VERY strong hint that you shouldn't neglect the possibility of having only a single solution.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Sat Aug 07, 2010 4:04 am
lunarpower wrote:i looked in our database. this question is ours, but it's currently deactivated -- i.e., it's not active in the CAT pool, so you shouldn't have seen it while you were taking the exam.

the only thing i can't see is the date on which the problem was deactivated. this thread is dated last week, which is a bit surprising -- i don't think that we've actually deactivated any questions in the last week -- but i can check with other members of the CAT problem committee.

in any case, i'll just reiterate the two things that i already said:
(1) the wording in this problem is still totally legitimate, from a mathematical standpoint. the "product of all numbers in a set" is perfectly well defined when the set contains only 1 number; the "product" is just that number.
HOWEVER,
(2) this problem is problematic, in that it's not representative of what has historically appeared on the exam. to date, i haven't seen a wording as "tricky" as this one.

--

incidentally, the parentheses in the word "solution(s)" are a VERY strong hint that you shouldn't neglect the possibility of having only a single solution.
Totally agree Ron, but what about the ordering of choices, was that really not taken care of, originally?
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Sat Aug 07, 2010 4:19 am
sanju09 wrote: Totally agree Ron, but what about the ordering of choices, was that really not taken care of, originally?
three things --
1) the answer choices shown in the current database are -4, -2, 0, 4, 6. so i don't know where this poster got these answer choices.
in fact, you posted this question here, with the correct answer choices:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/possible-sol ... 34823.html

... so i have no idea where this person got these answer choices. they aren't in our database, so they must have gotten the whole question from a second- or thirdhand source.

2) it's not actually true that the answer choices are always in order on official problems; see, e.g., problem solving #54, 70, and 138 in OG12.
however, it's true that i've never seen a problem on which a list of five whole numbers is out of order.

interestingly, in ratio problems in which the answers themselves are ratios, i've noticed that the five ratios (if treated as fractions) are out of order in almost all of the problems.

3) this is far less of a big deal than it would be in problems involving fractions, roots, etc., since the order of five integers is obvious even if they are not listed in order.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Sat Aug 07, 2010 4:52 am
lunarpower wrote:
sanju09 wrote: Totally agree Ron, but what about the ordering of choices, was that really not taken care of, originally?
three things --
1) the answer choices shown in the current database are -4, -2, 0, 4, 6. so i don't know where this poster got these answer choices.
in fact, you posted this question here, with the correct answer choices:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/possible-sol ... 34823.html

... so i have no idea where this person got these answer choices. they aren't in our database, so they must have gotten the whole question from a second- or thirdhand source.

2) it's not actually true that the answer choices are always in order on official problems; see, e.g., problem solving #54, 70, and 138 in OG12.
however, it's true that i've never seen a problem on which a list of five whole numbers is out of order.

interestingly, in ratio problems in which the answers themselves are ratios, i've noticed that the five ratios (if treated as fractions) are out of order in almost all of the problems.

3) this is far less of a big deal than it would be in problems involving fractions, roots, etc., since the order of five integers is obvious even if they are not listed in order.
I believe that there is a reason why GMAT PS choices are in an order as far as it's possible. Could you please throw some light on the reason why GMAT PS choices are mostly in an order?

best regards
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Sat Aug 07, 2010 4:58 am
sanju09 wrote:I believe that there is a reason why GMAT PS choices are in an order as far as it's possible. Could you please throw some light on the reason why GMAT PS choices are mostly in an order?

best regards
from a student's perspective, the primary benefit of ordering the choices is that "back-up methods", such as
* working backward from the answer choices
* estimating (guessing) the answer and then checking the choices,
are easier.
for instance, if you're using the "plug in the answer choice and then check" method, then it's easier if the choices are in order, since you can go up if your current answer is too small, and down if your current answer is too big.

if you are mostly, or entirely, solving problems using "textbook" methods, then the order of the choices is completely irrelevant.

--

as for why the gmat writers themselves put the choices in order in the first place -- i have no idea, although i'd imagine that it has something to do with easier organization.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:36 pm

by mainhoon » Sun Aug 08, 2010 9:16 pm
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
dinesh19aug wrote:Selango,
I am sorry but your answer is incorrect. The OA is +4.

The explanation says: When you square the two sides you introduce an ambiguous root. It MAY OR MAY NOT satisfy the equation. Try putting it "-1" in the original equation and you will see that you get

-1 = (-3 + 4)^1/2
which gives you -1 =1

Hence the only valid root is 4, which is the OA.
Did you copy the question exactly? Or did you add the "^1/2" because you couldn't copy the square root sign properly?

If the right side were "sqrt(3y + 4)", then it would only include the positive root. However, if it's reproduced correctly, then it should include both the positive and negative root.

What is the difference between ^1/2 and sqrt? Is it true that in PS in GMAT all roots are assumed positive, ie wherever you see a sqrt sign you know they are referring to the +ve square root of the number?

Do you agree with 4 as the answer?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
Thanked: 215 times
Followed by:7 members

by kvcpk » Sun Aug 08, 2010 9:50 pm
I think I found the right thread to post my question.

As per what I have heard, on the GMAT Land,
If it is given,
x = sqrt(36), then x=6
if it is given
x^2 = 36, then x can be 6 or -6

Am I right?

Then what about sqrt(x^2) ?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:44 pm
kvcpk wrote:I think I found the right thread to post my question.

As per what I have heard, on the GMAT Land,
If it is given,
x = sqrt(36), then x=6
if it is given
x^2 = 36, then x can be 6 or -6

Am I right?

Then what about sqrt(x^2) ?
sqrt(x^2) is positive x, if x ≠ 0.
Last edited by sanju09 on Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1460
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:28 am
Thanked: 135 times
Followed by:7 members

by selango » Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:46 pm
Sanju,

Please check the below GMATPREP problem,

https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-sq ... 63401.html

If sqrt(x^2)=x,then the answer is 1.

Can you please clarify?
--Anand--