BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MGMAT CAT CR

Expert replies
by [email protected] » Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:53 am
When Bob's Bistro opened in the town of Montrose last year, the proprietors of Andrew's Eatery, the only other restaurant in town, feared that their business would suffer. Surprisingly though, in the past year the average number of meals per day served at Andrew's Eatery has actually increased significantly.

Which of the following, if true, provides the best explanation for this occurrence?

A. The meals at Andrew's Eatery are substantially lower in price than those offered at Bob's Bistro.

B. Bob's Bistro is closed on Sundays, and so for Sunday brunch residents of Montrose would either go to Andrew's Eatery or venture to a neighboring town.

C. The profit per meal is higher, on average, at Bob's Bistro than it is at Andrew's Eatery.

D. Bob's Bistro attracts a large number of patrons that had never dined in Montrose before, and on
many days Bob's Bistro attracts more customers than it can seat.

E. Andrew's Eatery serves considerably more meals on weekends than it does on weekdays, which is not the case at Bob's Bistro.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by subgeeth » Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:05 am
IMO D
Join the discussion

by neoreaves » Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:11 am
the paradox we need to explain here is

"in the past year the average number of meals per day served at Andrew's Eatery has actually increased significantly"

we know that Bob's cafe opened up last year ....so what could have Bob's cafe done to increase meals per day at Andrew's cafe .....look at answer choices for answers



A. The meals at Andrew’s Eatery are substantially lower in price than those offered at Bob’s Bistro. Irrelevent -->we are not comparing prices here ....we have to account for the increase in the number of meals at Andrews.

B. Bob’s Bistro is closed on Sundays, and so for Sunday brunch residents of Montrose would either go to Andrew’s Eatery or venture to a neighboring town.the number of residents of Montrose is same ....so this doesn't account for the increase at Andrews

C. The profit per meal is higher, on average, at Bob’s Bistro than it is at Andrew’s Eatery.we arent concerned with profits

D. Bob’s Bistro attracts a large number of patrons that had never dined in Montrose before, and on
many days Bob’s Bistro attracts more customers than it can seat. Correct: This gives us information that there are more customers now because Bob's bistro attracts these new diners some of which go to Andrew's if Bob's is full

E. Andrew’s Eatery serves considerably more meals on weekends than it does on weekdays, which is not the case at Bob’s Bistro. we arent comparing weekends with weekdays
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:18 am
IMO D resolves the issue
the paradox here is that opening of Bob’s Bistro a new restuarant will hamper the business of Andrew’s Eatery, but in past year the average number of meals per day has actually increased significantly ....

prephrasing : some how customers of Andrew’s Eatery has increased

a) price is not an issue
b)stimulus says per day and therefore # of days for bistro is less than andrew's hence nullify the effect
c)PROFIT is not an issue
d) correct as matches our prepahsed ans
e)amount is irrelevant we are concerned abt # of meals
Join the discussion

by delhiboy1979 » Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:10 am
Even I selected option D, but could someone explain a good reason to reject E
Join the discussion