If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a · |b| < a - b?
(1) a < 0
(2) ab > 0
OA :E.Looking for solutions taking less than 2 mins.
(1) a < 0
(2) ab > 0
OA :E.Looking for solutions taking less than 2 mins.
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Featured Course
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
Mgmat: Absolute value DS
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
Since none of the statements are giving you information about the the relationship between a and b; the solution is E
I found an answer a hereshubhamkumar wrote:If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a · |b| < a - b?
(1) a < 0
(2) ab > 0
OA :E.Looking for solutions taking less than 2 mins.
|a| > |b| could be translated into a^2 > b^2 and a^2-b^2>0 or (a+b)(a-b)>0
Either a-b>0 or a-b<0 (cannot be zero). As we see a*|b| could be Either +ve or -ve.
st(1) a<0 implies a-b<0 or a<b. Sufficient
st(2) ab>=0 Insufficient as the signs of a and b not known
Success doesn't come overnight!
-
Shalabh's Quants
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 134
- Thanked: 35 times
=>|a| > |b| ; Is a · |b| < a - b; Taking few random values of a & b and analysing.shubhamkumar wrote:If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a · |b| < a - b?
(1) a < 0
(2) ab > 0
OA :E.Looking for solutions taking less than 2 mins.
=>Case 1; |-2|>|0| ; is a · |b| < a - b => -2.|0| < -2 - 0 => 0 < -2 => No.
=>Case 2; |-2|>|1| ; is a · |b| < a - b => -2.|1| < -2 - 1 => -2 < -3 => No.
=>Case 3; |-2|>|-1| ; is a · |b| < a - b => -2.|-1| < -2 + 1 => -2 < -1 => Yes.
Taking Stat.1...
a<0 ; This statement does not help as in above all cases a = -2 is less than 0. Stat. 1 is insufficient.
Taking Stat.2...
ab>0
In cases 1 & 3 ab>0 with contradicting results. Stat. 2 is insufficient.
Taking Stat.1 & 2 together...
Combining stat. 1 & 2 will make case 2 not applicable, but still cases 1 & 3 holds with contradicting results. Hence Stat. 1 & 2 together are insufficient.
Shalabh Jain,
e-GMAT Instructor
e-GMAT Instructor
-
GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- GMAT Score:790
To save time, try to plug in combinations that satisfy both statements.shubhamkumar wrote:If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a · |b| < a - b?
(1) a < 0
(2) ab > 0
OA :E.Looking for solutions taking less than 2 mins.
Since ab≥0 in statement 2, we should consider b=0.
Let b=0 and a=-1.
|a| > |b|, and both statements are satisfied.
Plugging these values into a · |b| < a - b, we get:
-1 * |0| < -1-0
0 < -1.
NO.
Let b=-1 and a=-2.
|a| > |b|, and both statements are satisfied.
Plugging these values into a · |b| < a - b, we get:
-2 * |-1| < -2-(-1)
-2 < -1.
YES.
Since in the first case the answer is NO, and in the second case the answer is YES, the two statements combined are INSUFFICIENT.
The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
Shalabh's Quants
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 134
- Thanked: 35 times
Hi,pemdas wrote:I found an answer a hereshubhamkumar wrote:If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a · |b| < a - b?
(1) a < 0
(2) ab > 0
OA :E.Looking for solutions taking less than 2 mins.
|a| > |b| could be translated into a^2 > b^2 and a^2-b^2>0 or (a+b)(a-b)>0
Either a-b>0 or a-b<0 (cannot be zero). As we see a*|b| could be Either +ve or -ve.
st(1) a<0 implies a-b<0 or a<b. Sufficient
st(2) ab>=0 Insufficient as the signs of a and b not known
Just to check with you. How can we conclude a · |b| < a - b if a-b<0 or a<b ?
Try these... say (a,b)=(-2,-1) => It says a · |b| < a - b
& (a,b)=(-2,1) => It says a · |b| > a - b
In both the cases a<0 and a<b.
Shalabh Jain,
e-GMAT Instructor
e-GMAT Instructor
That makes sense and the approach is out of the box.Are you suggesting that if we use both statements and prove that the stem cannot be solved with both statements, then answer would be E.GMATGuruNY wrote:To save time, try to plug in combinations that satisfy both statements.shubhamkumar wrote:If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a · |b| < a - b?
(1) a < 0
(2) ab > 0
OA :E.Looking for solutions taking less than 2 mins.
Since ab≥0 in statement 2, we should consider b=0.
Let b=0 and a=-1.
|a| > |b|, and both statements are satisfied.
Plugging these values into a · |b| < a - b, we get:
-1 * |0| < -1-0
0 < -1.
NO.
Let b=-1 and a=-2.
|a| > |b|, and both statements are satisfied.
Plugging these values into a · |b| < a - b, we get:
-2 * |-1| < -2-(-1)
-2 < -1.
YES.
Since in the first case the answer is NO, and in the second case the answer is YES, the two statements combined are INSUFFICIENT.
The correct answer is E.
Traditionally we are advised to eliminate each statement before using the two together.
-
GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- GMAT Score:790
When we plug values into statement 1, the ONLY requirement is that we satisfy statement 1 and any conditions in the question stem.shubhamkumar wrote:That makes sense and the approach is out of the box.Are you suggesting that if we use both statements and prove that the stem cannot be solved with both statements, then answer would be E.GMATGuruNY wrote:To save time, try to plug in combinations that satisfy both statements.shubhamkumar wrote:If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a · |b| < a - b?
(1) a < 0
(2) ab > 0
OA :E.Looking for solutions taking less than 2 mins.
Since ab≥0 in statement 2, we should consider b=0.
Let b=0 and a=-1.
|a| > |b|, and both statements are satisfied.
Plugging these values into a · |b| < a - b, we get:
-1 * |0| < -1-0
0 < -1.
NO.
Let b=-1 and a=-2.
|a| > |b|, and both statements are satisfied.
Plugging these values into a · |b| < a - b, we get:
-2 * |-1| < -2-(-1)
-2 < -1.
YES.
Since in the first case the answer is NO, and in the second case the answer is YES, the two statements combined are INSUFFICIENT.
The correct answer is E.
Traditionally we are advised to eliminate each statement before using the two together.
But we should also have our eye on statement 2.
If we can find combinations that satisfy BOTH statements, we can evaluate both statements at the same time.
In the problem at hand, I could see that it would be relatively easy to plug a value into statement 1 (a<0) that would also satisfy statement 2 (ab≥0).
Since the two combinations that I plugged in satisfied both statements and yielded different answers to the question stem, the correct answer here is E.
If the two combinations HAD NOT yielded different answers to the question stem, then I would have had to consider values that satisfy statement 1 but DO NOT satisfy statement 2 (such as a=-1 and b=2).
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
