MGMAT: Abs question

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:57 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:3 members

MGMAT: Abs question

by netigen » Sun Jun 01, 2008 1:43 pm
try this one in 2 mins
Attachments
Untitled 1.jpg

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:02 am
Thanked: 12 times

by jasonc » Sun Jun 01, 2008 1:49 pm
C?
I beat the GMAT! 760 (Q49/V44)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: USA
Thanked: 12 times
Followed by:1 members

by wizardofwashington » Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:48 pm
I get C as well.
A falling tree resounds... but a forest grows in silence...

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 2:13 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by s_raizada » Tue Jun 03, 2008 8:10 am
C for me

1) substitue following values for a, b
-3, 2, true
-2, 1, false

Not suff
2) substitue following values for a, b
-3, -2, true
-2, -1, true
2, 1, false
Not suff

taken together C

Second equation also test the cases when a, b are taken

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2621
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:38 am
The answer is E, but only because in Statement 2, the inequality is not strict. Notice in Statement 2, it's possible for b to be equal to zero. The question asks:

is a*|b| < a - b ?

If b is zero, this becomes:

is

0 < a ?

We know from Statement 1 that a is negative, so the answer is no. However, for any other valid values of a and b, the inequality will be true. Hence, E.

The question is much more interesting if the second statement is made into a strict inequality (i.e. remove the possibility that ab = 0). Then the answer is indeed C (though I'd note that it's vitally important that a and b are integers here). I think it's been demonstrated above that neither statement is sufficient on its own. Taken together, if we make the 2nd statement a strict inequality:

from 1: a is negative
from 2: a and b have the same sign, so b is also negative.

We also know that |a| > |b|, or in other words, a is further from zero than b is. If both a and b are negative, this means a < b.

So looking at the question- is a*|b| < a - b ?

Well, b is an integer, and we're now assuming it's not zero, so a*|b| can't be larger than a. It might be 2a, 3a, etc, but notice that since a is negative, we're getting smaller and smaller values the larger we make |b|. So the left side of that inequality is less than or equal to a. The right side is a - b, and b is negative: subtracting a negative is equivalent to adding a positive, and a-b must therefore be larger than a. So the left side is less than or equal to a, the right side is greater than a, and the inequality must be true. C.

Legendary Member
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:57 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:3 members

by netigen » Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:41 pm
OA is E