BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Mean-Median-Probability

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:22 pm
Thanked: 112 times
Followed by:13 members

Mean-Median-Probability

by smackmartine » Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:55 pm
Please time yourself...

If a randomly selected non negative single-digit integer is added to the set X{2,3,7,8} , what is the probability that the median of the set will increase while its range will remain the same?

A) 20%
B) 30%
C) 40%
D) 50%
E) 60%
Top
Source: — Problem Solving |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:34 am
Location: India
Thanked: 310 times
Followed by:123 members
GMAT Score:750

by cans » Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:00 pm
49 sec
median at present=5
thus to increase median, value should be greater than 5. thus 6,7,8,9
But range should remain same thus 9 is rejected (increases range)
3/10 = 30%
IMO B
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 11:10 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by peelamedu » Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:36 pm
If range is not be changed, then 1 & 9 can't be added.
The numbers that can be added to the set are 2,4,5,6,7,8. Then the median should be greater than 5.
This gives the numbers 6,7,8.

That is 3 out of 10 numbers.
The probability is 3/10 = 30 %
Answer is B
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:22 pm
Thanked: 112 times
Followed by:13 members

by smackmartine » Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:37 pm
OA B
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pm
Location: Malibu, CA
Thanked: 716 times
Followed by:255 members
GMAT Score:750

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:26 am
Nice work on this one, everyone! It looks like you all did this pretty quickly, and in that case one of my favorite activities with GMAT questions is to follow up by proposing a tweak to the problem or creating your own "trap" answer choice. This way you start to anticipate what the authors of the test will do to add difficulty to problems, and you'll be aware of those devices as you're testing.

Here, that word non-negative stands out to me - that means that we're dealing with all single-digit integers 0 through 9. But since it's one of multiple adjectives in the introductory clause, I think it's one of the more-likely-to-be-missed (or misunderstood) parts of this problem. My bet is that, simply by adding the answer choice 33% (3 out of 9), the GMAT could make this question a healthy 10-15 percentile points more difficulty by tricking people into thinking that there were only 9 eligible values.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:22 pm
Thanked: 112 times
Followed by:13 members

by smackmartine » Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:23 pm
Brian@VeritasPrep wrote:Nice work on this one, everyone! It looks like you all did this pretty quickly, and in that case one of my favorite activities with GMAT questions is to follow up by proposing a tweak to the problem or creating your own "trap" answer choice. This way you start to anticipate what the authors of the test will do to add difficulty to problems, and you'll be aware of those devices as you're testing.

Here, that word non-negative stands out to me - that means that we're dealing with all single-digit integers 0 through 9. But since it's one of multiple adjectives in the introductory clause, I think it's one of the more-likely-to-be-missed (or misunderstood) parts of this problem. My bet is that, simply by adding the answer choice 33% (3 out of 9), the GMAT could make this question a healthy 10-15 percentile points more difficulty by tricking people into thinking that there were only 9 eligible values.
Brain, I am a regular victim of such mistakes :( (not on this question but on few other probs) . In fact I have started making Quants error logs now. Even though I am strong in Quants all these silly mistakes are ruining my Quants score. Can you suggest any other effective way to avoid doing these?
Top
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed May 20, 2015 2:02 pm

by rohitd80 » Mon Jan 04, 2016 2:51 pm
Brian@VeritasPrep wrote:Nice work on this one, everyone! It looks like you all did this pretty quickly, and in that case one of my favorite activities with GMAT questions is to follow up by proposing a tweak to the problem or creating your own "trap" answer choice. This way you start to anticipate what the authors of the test will do to add difficulty to problems, and you'll be aware of those devices as you're testing.

Here, that word non-negative stands out to me - that means that we're dealing with all single-digit integers 0 through 9. But since it's one of multiple adjectives in the introductory clause, I think it's one of the more-likely-to-be-missed (or misunderstood) parts of this problem. My bet is that, simply by adding the answer choice 33% (3 out of 9), the GMAT could make this question a healthy 10-15 percentile points more difficulty by tricking people into thinking that there were only 9 eligible values.
Hello Brian and Experts,

I'm confused regarding the solution for this one:

P = Favorable/All Possible
So, P = 3 for {6,7,8} divided by 7 [2,3,4,5,6,7,8} = 3/7
The reason for All possible = 7 is that 0, 1, 9 will increase the range.
So, the P should be approx 40%?

I don't understand why you guys included 0,1 in your total possibilities while you did exclude 9 from total as well as favorable?

Please help to elaborate on this

Thanks,
Rohit
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
Location: Boston, MA
Thanked: 1153 times
Followed by:128 members
GMAT Score:770

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Mon Jan 04, 2016 3:42 pm
rohitd80 wrote:
Brian@VeritasPrep wrote:Nice work on this one, everyone! It looks like you all did this pretty quickly, and in that case one of my favorite activities with GMAT questions is to follow up by proposing a tweak to the problem or creating your own "trap" answer choice. This way you start to anticipate what the authors of the test will do to add difficulty to problems, and you'll be aware of those devices as you're testing.

Here, that word non-negative stands out to me - that means that we're dealing with all single-digit integers 0 through 9. But since it's one of multiple adjectives in the introductory clause, I think it's one of the more-likely-to-be-missed (or misunderstood) parts of this problem. My bet is that, simply by adding the answer choice 33% (3 out of 9), the GMAT could make this question a healthy 10-15 percentile points more difficulty by tricking people into thinking that there were only 9 eligible values.
Hello Brian and Experts,

I'm confused regarding the solution for this one:

P = Favorable/All Possible
So, P = 3 for {6,7,8} divided by 7 [2,3,4,5,6,7,8} = 3/7
The reason for All possible = 7 is that 0, 1, 9 will increase the range.
So, the P should be approx 40%?

I don't understand why you guys included 0,1 in your total possibilities while you did exclude 9 from total as well as favorable?

Please help to elaborate on this

Thanks,
Rohit
The total in the denominator represents the number of options that you're selecting from. In this case, if you're talking about nonnegative digits, we have the following options: {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9} giving us 10 possibilities. The fact that 0, 1, and 9 increase the range excludes them from the desired possibilities, not from the total.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1