BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

a kaplan CR

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 am
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:3 members

a kaplan CR

by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:42 pm
Enrollment in graduate and professional programs tends to be high in a strong economy and much lower during reccessions. the perceived likelihood of future job availability, therefore, affects people's willingness to pass up immediate earning potential in order to invest in career related training.

the argument above assumes that
A. the perceived likelihood of job availability has decreased in recent years
B. all those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of futre job.
C. perceptions of the likelihood of job availability are related of the state of the economy.
D. those who enroll in graduate and professional schools during a strong economy help increase the economy's strength.
E. graduate and professional programs admit fewer students during recessions.

i dont have OA
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:47 pm
Is it B?
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:08 pm
Location: St. Louis
Thanked: 312 times
Followed by:90 members

by Tani » Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:01 pm
The answer is D. The new term in the conclusion is perception of job availability - it must be linked to enrollment. D is the only one that relates enrollment in school to perceptions about the economy.
Tani Wolff
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:42 am
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:710

by ankurmit » Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:55 pm
I would like to go with C
--------
Ankur mittal
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:42 am
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:710

by ankurmit » Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:57 pm
Mam Tani Wolff - Are you sure its D

Or you wanted to select C and mentioned D by mistake
--------
Ankur mittal
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:08 pm
Location: St. Louis
Thanked: 312 times
Followed by:90 members

by Tani » Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:06 pm
Of course I meant C - just a typo - The one about perceptions is the correct one.
Tani Wolff
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 10:16 pm

by psychomath » Tue Sep 28, 2010 1:21 am
C it should be...Thankfully that was a typo - above :-)
Top
User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:05 pm
Location: West Lafayette
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:700

by g000fy » Tue Sep 28, 2010 7:44 am
Tani Wolff - Kaplan wrote:Of course I meant C - just a typo - The one about perceptions is the correct one.
Lol. I chose C too. Your previous response had confused me :roll:
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members

by GMATMadeEasy » Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:56 am
May be one can edit the OA in the original post. By the time reader comes to read this, he is shaken :) .
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 1:05 am

by focusgmat » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:40 am
Can anyone explain to me why option B is incorrect based on the negation rule for assumption question ? I feel I am making mistakes in assumption questions.

Will appreciate if any one can help me understand the negation rule when applied on option B and C in the above question.

My thoughts -

I chose B because I used the negation rules as follows.

B) NONE of those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

This negation is weakening the conclusion of the arg. Hence , option B is the answer.

Please help. I learned this strategy from Manhattan strategy guides.
Top
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1302
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 539 times
Followed by:164 members
GMAT Score:800

by Testluv » Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:08 am
focusgmat wrote:Can anyone explain to me why option B is incorrect based on the negation rule for assumption question ? I feel I am making mistakes in assumption questions.

Will appreciate if any one can help me understand the negation rule when applied on option B and C in the above question.

My thoughts -

I chose B because I used the negation rules as follows.

B) NONE of those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

This negation is weakening the conclusion of the arg. Hence , option B is the answer.

Please help. I learned this strategy from Manhattan strategy guides.
The negation of ALL isn't NONE. Instead, the negation of ALL is NOT ALL or "only some".
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 1:05 am

by focusgmat » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:29 pm
Thank you, Testluv.
I corrected my notes as well. Now I understand why option B (using negation rule) doesn't weaken the conclusion.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 3:49 am
Testluv wrote:
focusgmat wrote:Can anyone explain to me why option B is incorrect based on the negation rule for assumption question ? I feel I am making mistakes in assumption questions.

Will appreciate if any one can help me understand the negation rule when applied on option B and C in the above question.

My thoughts -

I chose B because I used the negation rules as follows.

B) NONE of those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

This negation is weakening the conclusion of the arg. Hence , option B is the answer.

Please help. I learned this strategy from Manhattan strategy guides.
All those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.
All those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do not do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

The negation of ALL isn't NONE. Instead, the negation of ALL is NOT ALL or "only some".
All those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

1)All those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

2)All those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do not do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.
How do we apply the negation rule .Is it 1) or 2)?
Top
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1302
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 539 times
Followed by:164 members
GMAT Score:800

by Testluv » Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:04 am
Hi Munda,

it would be neither 1 nor 2.

The negation of ALL DO would be NOT ALL DO or SOME DON'T. So it would be:

NOT all those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of futre job

which, here, for greater clarity we can rephrase to:

Some of those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do NOT do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs

or

Some of those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so for reasons other than the perceived lack of future jobs.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:09 am
Testluv wrote:Hi Munda,

it would be neither 1 nor 2.

The negation of ALL DO would be NOT ALL DO or SOME DON'T. So it would be:

NOT all those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of futre job

which, here, for greater clarity we can rephrase to:

Some of those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do NOT do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs

or

Some of those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so for reasons other than the perceived lack of future jobs.
All those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

1)Not All those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

2)All those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do not do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.
Edited option 1. sorries problem with my browser or ie.
How do we apply the negation rule .Is it 1) or 2)?
Top
Post new topic Post Reply