BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Market Observer

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 439
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 8:32 amFollowed by: 28 members
Location: India
Thanked: 34 times
by sivaelectric » Sun May 29, 2011 11:47 am
Market Observer, Summer 2008
Sheltcorp' sales went up 12.6% between 2005 and 2006. Now that its 2007 sales figures have been released, we can see that its sales in 2007 were 38.6% greater than its sales in 2006. Clearly, Sheltcorp has a winning formula and 2008 sales will be higher still.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion espoused above?
  • A. Sheltcorp' 2007 sales figures are preliminary and may change by upto 2% when the final figures are calculated.
    B. In 2006 and 2007, at the annual trade show in January Sheltcorp released popular new products that increased Sheltcorp' sales figures for their respective years, but Sheltcorp did not release any new products at the 2008 trade show.
    C. Sheltcorp offers a bonus to its employees based on annual sales.
    D. The 12.6% increase in sales is the smallest annual increase seen in the past five years of Sheltcorp' history.
    E. Economic forces, rather than individual company actions, are often the largest influence on annual sales figures.
If I am wrong correct me :), If my post helped let me know by clicking the Thanks button ;).

Chitra Sivasankar Arunagiri
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:34 amFollowed by: 123 members
Location: India
Thanked: 310 times
GMAT Score:750

by cans » Sun May 29, 2011 1:23 pm
IMO B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:52 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Location: Dallas
Thanked: 10 times

by hardikm » Sun May 29, 2011 4:29 pm
Easy one.
Conclusion: Clearly, Sheltcorp has a winning formula and 2008 sales will be higher still.
Premise: Sheltcorp' sales went up 12.6% between 2005 and 2006. Now that its 2007 sales figures have been released, we can see that its sales in 2007 were 38.6% greater than its sales in 2006.

What will weaken the argument?? Part of actual revenue of 2006 were accounted in 2007. Then Sheltcorp did not do any magic but to move its part of the revenue to 2007.
IMO B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 439
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 8:32 amFollowed by: 28 members
Location: India
Thanked: 34 times

by sivaelectric » Sun May 29, 2011 8:22 pm
Yes and easy one. OA B
If I am wrong correct me :), If my post helped let me know by clicking the Thanks button ;).

Chitra Sivasankar Arunagiri
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 150
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:36 amFollowed by: 2 members
Location: gurgaon
Thanked: 8 times

by itsmebharat » Mon May 30, 2011 1:50 am
Have a look again..
Clearly, Sheltcorp has a winning formula and 2008 sales will be higher still.

B. In 2006 and 2007, at the annual trade show in January Sheltcorp released popular new products that increased Sheltcorp' sales figures for their respective years, but Sheltcorp did not release any new products at the 2008 trade show.

I agree B is the right option, but argument talks about future and the answer is in past, Can someone explains reason behind that.
I am not an Expert, please feel free to suggest if there is an error.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:02 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 5 times

by champmag » Mon May 30, 2011 1:53 am
+1 for B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:34 amFollowed by: 123 members
Location: India
Thanked: 310 times
GMAT Score:750

by cans » Mon May 30, 2011 12:36 pm
itsmebharat wrote: I agree B is the right option, but argument talks about future and the answer is in past, Can someone explains reason behind that.
Consider all other options:-
Market Observer, Summer 2008
Sheltcorp' sales went up 12.6% between 2005 and 2006. Now that its 2007 sales figures have been released, we can see that its sales in 2007 were 38.6% greater than its sales in 2006. Clearly, Sheltcorp has a winning formula and 2008 sales will be higher still.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion espoused above?

A. Sheltcorp' 2007 sales figures are preliminary and may change by upto 2% when the final figures are calculated.
B. In 2006 and 2007, at the annual trade show in January Sheltcorp released popular new products that increased Sheltcorp' sales figures for their respective years, but Sheltcorp did not release any new products at the 2008 trade show.
C. Sheltcorp offers a bonus to its employees based on annual sales.
D. The 12.6% increase in sales is the smallest annual increase seen in the past five years of Sheltcorp' history.
E. Economic forces, rather than individual company actions, are often the largest influence on annual sales figures.
B) explains the reason why sales in 2006 & 2007 were extraordinary and as that reason is not valid for 2008, thus we can't conclude that winning formula will continue.
Also if you consider other options, A) doesn't weaken the argument
C)actually supports a bit (employees motivated to increase sales)
d) supportive as it says that company generally has high increase in sales.
e) not relevant as such
Thus B is the one.. :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1