BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Manhattan GMAT Test Problem

Expert replies
by bubbliiiiiiii » Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:22 am
Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 cards each. Each of the 6 cards within a suit has a different value from 1 to 6; thus, for each value from 1 to 6, there are two cards in the deck with that value. Bill likes to play a game in which he shuffles the deck, turns over 4 cards, and looks for pairs of cards that have the same value. What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value?

8/33

62/165

17/33

103/165

25/33

OA C

Can anyone detail the working of this problem?
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Frankenstein » Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:29 am
Hi,
This has been discussed in detail. If you are looking only for solution, you can go through smackmartine's post and my post.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/probability- ... 85056.html
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Mon Jun 27, 2011 10:02 am
Excerpts from your post from the URL above:
First we will the number of ways of picking 4 cards with distinct values.
Number of ways of picking 1st card is 12
2nd card with value distinct from 1st can be picked from 10(12 minus 1st card and card with same value as 1st) in 10 ways
Similarly, 3rd card in 8 ways
and 4th card in 6 ways.
So, number of ways is 12.10.8.6
Total number of ways of picking 4 cards one after the other i 12.11.10.9
So, probability of picking 4 cards with distinct values is 12.10.8.6/12.11.10.9 = 16/33
So, probability of getting at least 1 pair = 1-(probability of getting 4 distinct values) = 1-16/33 = 17/33
I did exactly the same way till the total no. of favourable outcomes.

What I did for total no. of outcomes, i.e., to select four cards from set of 12 cards was 12C4 ways..

which is ..

12!/(8!4!)

and you did it as
Total number of ways of picking 4 cards one after the other i 12.11.10.9
Is the difference in our approaches due to the phrase 'one after the other', which is used by you and not by me?

Is the formula nCr=n!/[n!(n-r)!] applicable only when r items are picked from n items and replaced?
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Mon Jun 27, 2011 10:18 am
bubbliiiiiiii wrote:Excerpts from your post from the URL above:
First we will the number of ways of picking 4 cards with distinct values.
Number of ways of picking 1st card is 12
2nd card with value distinct from 1st can be picked from 10(12 minus 1st card and card with same value as 1st) in 10 ways
Similarly, 3rd card in 8 ways
and 4th card in 6 ways.
So, number of ways is 12.10.8.6
Total number of ways of picking 4 cards one after the other i 12.11.10.9
So, probability of picking 4 cards with distinct values is 12.10.8.6/12.11.10.9 = 16/33
So, probability of getting at least 1 pair = 1-(probability of getting 4 distinct values) = 1-16/33 = 17/33
I did exactly the same way till the total no. of favourable outcomes.

What I did for total no. of outcomes, i.e., to select four cards from set of 12 cards was 12C4 ways..

which is ..

12!/(8!4!)

and you did it as
Total number of ways of picking 4 cards one after the other i 12.11.10.9
Is the difference in our approaches due to the phrase 'one after the other', which is used by you and not by me?
Hi,
Got your point..While calculating the first part(favourable outcomes) we have considered the order right, by which I mean:
We are counting the combination 1,2,3,4 different from 2,3,4,1 4,3,2,1 and so on..
So, when counting the total number of ways also, we need to consider the order hence we write it as 12P4.
Is the formula nCr=n!/[n!(n-r)!] applicable only when r items are picked from n items and replaced?
No, we use nCr when we select r items from n items and the order is not important.
When r items are picked from n items one after other and replaced, then the number of ways is n^r.

This particular problem can be done using the formula 12C4 as you used, but then the number of ways we calculated for the 4 picked to be different should be divided by 4! as well because we are considering that order doesn't matter while calculating the total number of ways.
Please let me know if you still have a problem with my logic.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion