bonus money

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
Thanked: 82 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:720

bonus money

by maihuna » Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:15 am
The amount of bonus money that
managers take home has declined
through the 1990s, causing an exodus
of experienced financial services
advisors to a variety of nontraditional
industries. These industries, while
unable to offer competitive salaries and
bonuses, have been forced to find
creative methods of compensation for
productive managers.


Which of the following is an assumption underlying the information presented in the first paragraph of the passage?




There was no cause for the managerial exodus more significant than the decrease in bonus levels.

Nontraditional industries provide more comprehensive benefits than does the financial services industry.

The rise in profits at nontraditional industries is due to the influx of financial managers.

A longer tenure at a given company leads to greater managerial and experiential efficiencies.

Prior to 1990, bonus levels in the financial services industry were consistently rising.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Fri Oct 30, 2009 12:32 pm
[spoiler]E & A[/spoiler] seems tempting.. I go for [spoiler]E!!![/spoiler]
IMO E

Legendary Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:14 am
Location: Atlanta
Thanked: 17 times

by pandeyvineet24 » Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:02 pm
I was between A and B. Picked A

Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:13 pm
I would like to go with A.

E seems to be irrelevant to the argument. There is no information whether the bonus was constant or was it rising.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 256
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:31 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by gmatv09 » Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:29 pm
By PoE ... IMO - A

Legendary Member
Posts: 882
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:690

by crackgmat007 » Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:51 pm
Yeah...by POE only A seems plausible

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:48 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:740

by 2010gmat » Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:56 pm
The amount of bonus money that
managers take home has declined
through the 1990s,

causing an exodus
of experienced financial services
advisors to a variety of nontraditional
industries

so if there is some other reason for the exodus then the argument falls apart...hence A

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Sun Nov 01, 2009 12:24 am
Yeah.. A seems to be the right Pick

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:59 pm
Thanked: 8 times

A

by brick2009 » Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:06 pm
In assumoption problem, try the denial test.

A: IF there is another reason(stress @ work) , other than bonus for exodus of managers, then this whole argument falls apart.

This (finance) is the only reason why the exodus occurred.

Hence A correct.