BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Manahattan Q : Why is E wrong?

Expert replies
by himu » Thu Nov 06, 2014 8:20 pm
HI,

I have already searched this question in other forums but IN THIS QUESTION THE ANS CHOICE E is different than in previous question having the same stimulus & I am having trouble eliminatig it, can u pls help me ?

TIA !!!

For each of the past two years, major department stores have reported a nearly 50% increase in their revenue generated from the sale of men's clothing manufactured by Zachary, Inc., a result that is all the more surprising because the sales of most other brands of men's clothing have been depressed over the same period. Nevertheless, Z.A.C., the parent company of Zachary Inc, does not appear to have emerged unscathed from the overall trend of decreased sales in the industry: Z.A.C. has reported a slight decline in overall sales in each of the past two years.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the surprising result above?


The sales of clothing at Zachary, Inc.'s boutique stores, which, unlike department stores, are owned and operated by the company itself, have held steady over the last two years.

Two years ago, Zachary, Inc. began an ambitious new advertising campaign; in each of the last two years, the company's advertising department has overspent its planned budget by almost half.

Z.A.C. is renowned for the quality of its fabrics, and sells large quantities of fabric to a variety of manufacturers of men's clothing.

Zachary, Inc. formerly manufactured leather accessories and women's clothing in addition to men's clothing, but, for the past three years, the company has produced only men's clothing.

In the last two years, Z.A.C., in addition to maintaining its prior business ventures, expanded into two new markets, neither of which has been particularly profitable thus far.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Nov 10, 2014 3:44 am
himu wrote:HI,

I have already searched this question in other forums but IN THIS QUESTION THE ANS CHOICE E is different than in previous question having the same stimulus & I am having trouble eliminatig it, can u pls help me ?

TIA !!!

For each of the past two years, major department stores have reported a nearly 50% increase in their revenue generated from the sale of men's clothing manufactured by Zachary, Inc., a result that is all the more surprising because the sales of most other brands of men's clothing have been depressed over the same period. Nevertheless, Z.A.C., the parent company of Zachary Inc, does not appear to have emerged unscathed from the overall trend of decreased sales in the industry: Z.A.C. has reported a slight decline in overall sales in each of the past two years.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the surprising result above?


The sales of clothing at Zachary, Inc.'s boutique stores, which, unlike department stores, are owned and operated by the company itself, have held steady over the last two years.

Two years ago, Zachary, Inc. began an ambitious new advertising campaign; in each of the last two years, the company's advertising department has overspent its planned budget by almost half.

Z.A.C. is renowned for the quality of its fabrics, and sells large quantities of fabric to a variety of manufacturers of men's clothing.

Zachary, Inc. formerly manufactured leather accessories and women's clothing in addition to men's clothing, but, for the past three years, the company has produced only men's clothing.

In the last two years, Z.A.C., in addition to maintaining its prior business ventures, expanded into two new markets, neither of which has been particularly profitable thus far.
FACT 1: Sales of Zachary, Inc.'s MEN'S CLOTHING have INCREASED.
FACT 2: The parent company Z.A.C. has reported a DECREASE in OVERALL sales.

There is only one way that the parent company's OVERALL SALES could have decreased while Zachary's sales of MEN'S CLOTHING have increased: the parent company must manufacturer ANOTHER PRODUCT WHOSE SALES HAVE DECREASED, offsetting the increase in the company's sales of men's clothing.

Answer choice C: Zachary, Inc. is renowned for the quality of its fabrics, and sells large quantities of fabric to other manufacturers of men's clothing.
Since the sales of OTHER BRANDS of men's clothing have been depressed, other manufacturers of men's clothing likely are ordering smaller quantities of Zachary, Inc.'s fabrics, explaining why there has been a decrease in the parent company's OVERALL SALES.

The correct answer C.

E: In the last two years, Z.A.C., in addition to maintaining its prior business ventures, expanded into two new markets, neither of which has been particularly profitable thus far.
This answer choice indicates that expansion into two new markets has not yielded an INCREASE IN PROFITS.
It does not explain why OVERALL SALES HAVE DECREASED.
A very important distinction:
Profits and sales are NOT the same thing.
On its own, the amount of profit does not tell us anything about the number of sales.
Eliminate E.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Fri Nov 14, 2014 7:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Aman Ahuja » Fri Nov 14, 2014 5:14 am
Hi Mitch,
Can you please explain why D is incorrect
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Nov 14, 2014 7:10 am
Aman Ahuja wrote:Hi Mitch,
Can you please explain why D is incorrect
D:
For the past three years, Zachary, Inc. has produced only men's clothing.
Passage:
For each of the past two years, major department stores have reported a nearly 50% increase in their revenue generated from the sale of men's clothing manufactured by Zachary, Inc.
Here, sales of the one product manufactured by Zachary -- men's clothing -- have increased by nearly 50%.
Thus, D does not explain in any way why overall sales have decreased.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Sep 09, 2015 8:12 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Aman Ahuja wrote:Hi Mitch,
Can you please explain why D is incorrect
D:
For the past three years, Zachary, Inc. has produced only men's clothing.
Passage:
For each of the past two years, major department stores have reported a nearly 50% increase in their revenue generated from the sale of men's clothing manufactured by Zachary, Inc.
Here, sales of the one product manufactured by Zachary -- men's clothing -- have increased by nearly 50%.
Thus, D does not explain in any way why overall sales have decreased.
Hi Mitch

If we consider option D.
It says that Zachary previously manufactured leather accessories along with men's clothing but now it has stopped producing other items.
So say old revenue generated R(old) = R(leather) + R(men's clothing)
And new revenue R(new) = R(men's clothing)
Now by keeping R(new) and R(old) same,we get an effective revenue increase for R(men's clothing) which explains the anomaly.

Do let me know what am I missing here.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Sep 10, 2015 4:54 am
[email protected] wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Aman Ahuja wrote:Hi Mitch,
Can you please explain why D is incorrect
D:
For the past three years, Zachary, Inc. has produced only men's clothing.
Passage:
For each of the past two years, major department stores have reported a nearly 50% increase in their revenue generated from the sale of men's clothing manufactured by Zachary, Inc.
Here, sales of the one product manufactured by Zachary -- men's clothing -- have increased by nearly 50%.
Thus, D does not explain in any way why overall sales have decreased.
Hi Mitch

If we consider option D.
It says that Zachary previously manufactured leather accessories along with men's clothing but now it has stopped producing other items.
So say old revenue generated R(old) = R(leather) + R(men's clothing)
And new revenue R(new) = R(men's clothing)
Now by keeping R(new) and R(old) same,we get an effective revenue increase for R(men's clothing) which explains the anomaly.

Do let me know what am I missing here.
According to D, Zachary has not produced leather goods and women's clothing FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS.
According to the passage, there has been a decline in overall sales IN EACH OF THE LAST TWO YEARS.
A change that took place 3 years ago cannot serve to explain the decline in sales between 2 years ago and last year.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion