BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Major pepper growers

Expert replies
by soumyopriyosaha » Tue Jan 26, 2010 6:39 am
Partly because of bad weather, but also partly because some major pepper growers have switched to high-priced cocoa, world production of pepper has been running well below worldwide sales for three years. Pepper is consequently in relatively short supply. The price of pepper has soared in response: it now equals that of cocoa.

Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) Pepper is a profitable crop only if it is grown on a large scale.
(B) World consumption of pepper has been unusually high for three years.
(C) World production of pepper will return to previous levels once normal weather returns.
(D) Surplus stocks of pepper have been reduced in the past three years.
(E) The profits that the growers of pepper have made in the past three years have been unprecedented.

OA: D
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by thephoenix » Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:42 am
production low-----causes shortage------causes inc in price
B and D are close
now there can be two reasons either consumption is high or the avialbilty is low

as long as there are extra stock is available the shortage rose bcoz of high consumtion can be met

hence B can be eliminted

D it is bcoz if surplus stock is finished then the shortage can not be overcome and hence price will inc
Join the discussion

by akahuja143 » Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:35 am
I agree it should be D because reduction in surplus stock would result in shortage and therby increasing the price
Join the discussion

by mmon » Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:05 am
IMO D

A) the passage doesn't tell us anything about the profitability of pepper
(B) Out of scope
(C) weather is only one of the reasons why the pepper production has gone down.
(D) Correct. The passage states that "Pepper is consequently in relatively short supply."
(E) out of scope. we don't know about profitability
Join the discussion

by vijay_venky » Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:23 pm
P1. World Production of pepper < World sales of pepper because
1. of bad weather
2. major pepper growers switched to cocoa
P2. Consequently pepper --> short supply
P3. So the Price of pepper soared --> equals cocoa (now).


Inference question is a must be true question. Now we have to find an answer that must be true.

A- Nothing in the argument confirms this.
B- Argument says that the supply has been very low but never said that the consumption is high.
C- Two reasons have been stated so it could not be necessarily true.
D- Argument says Production <Sales, so surplus should have been reduced, must be true.
E- Tempting, but we do not know whether it was unprecedented, as the awareness of the short supply could have made the profits inevitable.

D a complete winner.
Join the discussion

by ajith » Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 am
soumyopriyosaha wrote:Partly because of bad weather, but also partly because some major pepper growers have switched to high-priced cocoa, world production of pepper has been running well below worldwide sales for three years. Pepper is consequently in relatively short supply. The price of pepper has soared in response: it now equals that of cocoa.

Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) Pepper is a profitable crop only if it is grown on a large scale.
(B) World consumption of pepper has been unusually high for three years.
(C) World production of pepper will return to previous levels once normal weather returns.
(D) Surplus stocks of pepper have been reduced in the past three years.
(E) The profits that the growers of pepper have made in the past three years have been unprecedented.

OA: D
A) Cannot be inferred from the passage
B) No. passage says it is a supply problem than a demand problem
C) Bad weather is one of the reasons why production is low - cannot be inferred
D) Passage says production has been consistently lower than consumption in past 3 years & so, surpluses would have diminished - can be inferred
E) There is no data given apart from prices soared - but there was bad weather also .. cannot be inferred
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 10:43 pm
I like the explanation on D
Join the discussion