M+z>0?

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 5:30 am

M+z>0?

by Mormuse » Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:50 am
1) m-3z>0
2) 4z-m >0

I might do something wrong cause everytime i deal with this type of question, i get stuck after my first step. Actuaaly i almost always start by the following:
m>3z. If both m & z are positive then yes m+z is positive, if both are negative then no. If one of them is positive and the other negative, then no.
Same with the other statement and i usually cannot conclude.
What am i doing wrong? Is it possible to have a comprehensive approach of how to tackler these?
Many thx in advance.
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 2:19 am
Location: Cape Town
Thanked: 6 times

by rintoo22 » Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:07 am
hi claudayst,

I understand this is a DS question. You have posted the Statements and not the question. Kindly post the question.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:12 am
Is m + z > 0

1) m - 3z > 0
2) 4z - m > 0



Target question: m + z > 0

Statement 1: m - 3z > 0
There are several sets of numbers that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: m = 4 and z = 1, in which case m + z is greater than 0
Case a: m = 4 and z = -10, in which case m + z is not greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: 4z - m > 0
There are several sets of numbers that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: m = 1 and z = 4, in which case m + z is greater than 0
Case a: m = -10 and z = 1, in which case m + z is not greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined:
Rearrange statement 1 to get: -3z + m > 0
Statement 2: 4z - m > 0
Since both inequality signs are facing the same direction, we can add the two given inequalities to get: z > 0
In other words, z is positive.

If z is positive, then 3z is positive, and if 3z is positive then m must be positive (since we know that 3z < m)

If z and m are both positive, then m + z must be greater than 0
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer = C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Mar 30, 2013 6:14 am
claudayst wrote: Is m+z > 0?

1) m-3z>0
2) 4z-m >0
Statement 1: m > 3z.
It's possible that z=1 and m=4.
In this case, m+z > 0.
It's possible that z=-10 and m=4.
In this case, m+z < 0.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: m < 4z
It's possible that z=1 and m=3.
In this case, m+z > 0.
It's possible that z=1 and m=-10.
In this case, m+z < 0.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
One approach is to LINK together the inequalities.
Since 3z < m and m < 4z, we get:
3z < m < 4z
3z < 4z
0 < z.
Since z>0 and m > 3z, m > 0.
Thus, m+z > 0.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3