m<p

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2135
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:26 am
Location: https://martymurraycoaching.com/
Thanked: 955 times
Followed by:140 members
GMAT Score:800

by MartyMurray » Sat May 07, 2016 5:42 am
If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?

(1) m < p

(2) m < 0
Statement 1: m < p

Case 1: v = 0 If v = 0, then mv = pv. So v ≠ 0

Case 2: v < 0 If v < 0 and m < p, then mv > pv. So v cannot be less than 0.

Case 3: v > 0 If v > 0 and m < p, then mv < pv. So v > 0.

Sufficient.

Statement 2: m < 0

Case 1: v = 0 If v = 0, then mv = 0. So v ≠ 0

Case 2: v < 0 If v < 0 and m < 0, then mv > 0. So v cannot be less than 0.

Case 3: v > 0 If v > 0 and m < 0, then mv < 0. So v > 0.

Sufficient.

The correct answer is D.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat May 07, 2016 6:34 am
If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?

1) m < p
2) m < 0
Nice question.

Target question: Is v > 0

Given: mv < pv < 0

Statement 1: m < p

IMPORTANT: Notice what happens if we take mv < pv and divide both sides by v.
The resulting inequality will depend on whether v is NEGATIVE or POSITIVE. So, let's consider two cases:
case a: v is NEGATIVE.
When we take mv < pv and divide both sides by v, we get m > p
We changed the direction of the inequality sign since we divided by a NEGATIVE value.

case b: v is POSITIVE.
When we take mv < pv and divide both sides by v, we get m < p
The direction of the inequality sign stayed the same since we divided by a POSITIVE value.

Statement 1 tells us that m < p, which means we can rule out case a.
So, we conclude that v is POSITIVE
In other words, v > 0
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: m < 0
We're told that mv < pv < 0, which means that mv < 0
In other words, the product mv is NEGATIVE
Statement 2 tell us that m is NEGATIVE
In order for the product mv to be NEGATIVE, v must be positive
In other words, v > 0
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer = D

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:16 pm
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:740

by nchaswal » Sat May 07, 2016 8:59 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?

1) m < p
2) m < 0
Nice question.

.
.
.
.
.


Cheers,
Brent
Brent
Very good approach. I used this approach itself but your's is more refined. It is attacking the problem right away from the question stem and before one even looks at the Statements, one can expect WHAT is needed to find the asked value or question. I surely want to master this technique. I am just a greenhorn right now. Any tips how to make sure the technique is embedded in the brain and is automatic?
It is GMAT. So what?