While atomism, a natural philosophy

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:57 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 1 times

While atomism, a natural philosophy

by YellowSapphire » Sun Jun 12, 2011 6:30 am
While atomism, a natural philosophy common to
numerous ancient traditions including Jainism and Greek
metaphysics, revolves around an idea of the atom
fundamentally similar to our unit of modern physics, the
(5) philosophical apprehension of the term is altogether
more abstract. While the philosophical atom can have any
number of qualities, such as infinitesimal size,
indestructibility, immutability, and instantaneous
existence, it is almost intrinsically unlike the
(10) physical atom, whose characteristics have been the
object of progressive precision throughout the history
of science, in that its actual physical makeup is in a
sense immaterial. Briefly put, the metaphysical atom is
the basic indivisible unit of existence, not just of matter;
(15) the natural world as perceived by an atomist consists of
nothing but atoms and void, the former traveling through
the latter and coupling with each other in a series of
productive collisions that result in the world's
various macroscopic substances. True atomism holds that
(20) there is nothing else in the world: composite objects
such as plants and planets actually do not exist,
leading the atomist position down a path that seems to
end in nihilism-accounting for the difficulty many
philosophers have had historically in espousing it.
(25) (Simples theory eventually emerged as a counterpart to
atomism that granted ontological validity to objects qua
confederations of atoms.) Interestingly, the divergence
between physical and philosophical atoms only truly came
about in the twentieth century with the discovery of
(30) subatomic particles, prior to which chemists and
physicists viewed the atom in accordance with its
etymology-the Greek a-tomos literally means "not
cuttable."

Simples theory can be defined as all of the following EXCEPT:

A: A variant of atomism that allows for objects not made up of atoms
B: An alternative to atomism introduced as a reaction to its nihilist leanings
C: An ontological system whereby macroscopic substances are considered real
D: A version of philosophical atomism more faithful to the conclusions of physics
E: A way for plants and planets to exist within a loose framework of atoms and void

OA: A
Yellow Sapphire
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
Thanked: 105 times
Followed by:14 members

by vikram4689 » Mon Jun 13, 2011 12:09 am
We need to choose an option that defines simple theories, which emerged as a counterpart atomists' theory and which philosophers have no difficulty in accepting. I think A should be correct if EXCEPT is not there. Can you share explanation given by Grockit.
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)