LSAT CR

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:24 pm
Thanked: 1 times

LSAT CR

by ab78 » Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:19 am
It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from a cause which is known only by one particular effect. This is incorrect because the inferred effect must necessarily be produced by some different characteristic of the cause than is the observed effect, which already serves entirely to describe the cause.
Which one of the following arguments makes the same logical error as the one described by the author in the passage?
(A) An anonymous donor gave a thousand dollars to our historical society. I would guess that that individual also volunteers at the children’s hospital.
(B) The radioactive material caused a genetic mutation, which, in turn, caused the birth defect. Therefore, the radioactive material caused the birth defect.
(C) The tiny, unseen atom is the source of immense power. It must be its highly complex structure that produces this power.
(D) The city orchestra received more funds from the local government this year than ever before. Clearly this administration is more civic-minded than previous ones.
(E) If I heat water, which is a liquid, it evaporates. If I heat hundreds of other liquids like water, they evaporate. Therefore, if I heat any liquid like water, it will evaporate.


Sven: Trade unions are traditionally regarded by governments and economists as restraints of trade, working against the complete freedom of the economy, but I believe that unions are indispensable since they are often the worker’s only protection against exploitation.
Ravi: I don’t agree. The exploitation of the workers and their work is a normal part of ordinary trade just like the exploitation of natural or other material resources.
Sven and Ravi will not be able to resolve their disagreement logically unless they
(A) define a key term
(B) rely on the opinions of established authorities
(C) question an unproved premise
(D) present supporting data
(E) distinguish fact from opinion

Legendary Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: UK
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:680

by rohangupta83 » Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:20 am
Answer to the first one should be (B)

Error pointed out by the author -
It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from a cause which is known only by one particular effect.


so basically if 1 cause points to two different effects, its incorrect.

Cause--------------------Effect 1----------------Effect 2
radioactive material----genetic mutation------Birth Defect

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 163
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:54 pm
Thanked: 7 times

Isit really B

by jeevan.Gk » Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:21 am
Hi, Is it just ur answer.. Or the real answer is also B. Let me know

Legendary Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: UK
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:680

Re: Isit really B

by rohangupta83 » Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:21 am
jeevan.Gk wrote:Hi, Is it just ur answer.. Or the real answer is also B. Let me know
this is just my answer jeevan

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:24 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by ab78 » Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:53 am
Yeah I had picked B too. But OA seems to be A. This question is from GMAT-LSAT CR Doc that I have. I think it is same as 1000CR.

Do you want to try second one I will post the OA later.

Legendary Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: UK
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:680

by rohangupta83 » Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:58 am
by the way, do you have the link to 1000CR? I've been searching for the link but unable to find it anywhere.

Legendary Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: UK
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:680

by rohangupta83 » Sat Oct 25, 2008 11:01 am
for the second one i'm a little confused between A and D

I'll probably go for A

I think they should define what exploitation of workers really is to conclude whether trade unions are required or not.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:24 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by ab78 » Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:18 pm
yeah it is A :). No I don't have a link, my friend sent me this as a word doc.

Legendary Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: UK
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:680

by rohangupta83 » Sun Oct 26, 2008 12:14 am
Hey, no problem. If you do come across 1000CR please let me know.

Thanks

Legendary Member
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
Thanked: 12 times

by nervesofsteel » Wed Nov 05, 2008 1:50 am
the answer to 1 should be A as

The question states that one cause showing 2 effects will be due to different reasons.

in A one person donating to two societies would be due to two different reasons..

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 280
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:18 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:610

by Jatinder » Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:39 am
nervesofsteel wrote:the answer to 1 should be A as

The question states that one cause showing 2 effects will be due to different reasons.

in A one person donating to two societies would be due to two different reasons..
Whar are the 2 effects here ?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:58 am

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 3:13 am
I believe the correct answer should be B