• NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
Hundreds of Questions Highly Detailed Reporting Expert Explanations
• 7 CATs FREE!
If you earn 100 Forum Points

Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS Earn 10 Points Per Post Earn 10 Points Per Thanks Earn 10 Points Per Upvote ## LSAT Assumption qstn- effective way to reduce such emissions tagged by: ##### This topic has 5 member replies ## LSAT Assumption qstn- effective way to reduce such emissions Please hlep me with your response on below CR Assumption question from LSAT powerScore CR guide: Emissions from automobiles that burn gasoline and automobiles that burn diesel fuel are threatening the quality of life on our planet, contaminating both urban air and global atmosphere. Therefore, the only effective way to reduce such emissions is to replace the conventional diesel fuel and gasoline used in automobiles with cleaner-burning fuels, such as methanol, that create fewer emissions. Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? (A) Reducing the use of automobiles would not be a more effective means to reduce automobile emissions than the use of methanol. (B) There is no fuel other than methanol that is cleaner-burning than both diesel fuel and gasoline. (C) If given a choice of automobile fuels, automobile owners would not select gasoline over methanol. (D) Automobile emissions constitute the most serious threat to the global environment. (E) At any given time there is a direct correlation between the level of urban air pollution and the level of contamination present in the global atmosphere. OA follows.. Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 14 Sep 2009 Posted: 344 messages Followed by: 3 members Upvotes: 28 GMAT Score: 700 IMO: E - Premise: Gasoline and Diesel engine produce emission which is causing pollution. Conclusion: the only way to reduce emission it to switch to methanol. GAP - reducing emission will reduce pollution. so a direct relationship has been assumed. Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Joined 14 May 2010 Posted: 7 messages Test Date: 08/16/2011 Target GMAT Score: 760 sunnyjohn wrote: IMO: E - Premise: Gasoline and Diesel engine produce emission which is causing pollution. Conclusion: the only way to reduce emission it to switch to methanol. GAP - reducing emission will reduce pollution. so a direct relationship has been assumed. my strategy was to try and hurt the conclusion in order to find the assumption without which the conclusion can not hold true. I guess, author's point is to emphasise the use of cleaner burning fuels, such as methanol. Also, author mentioned that "The only effective way to" which means that he holds strong position about cleaner-burning fuel. I am not able to understand the reasoning behind OA. OA - 'A' Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Joined 26 Jun 2008 Posted: 67 messages Upvotes: 1 IMO :A The conclusion is 'The only effective way.....' this ignores all other ways to curb pollution. Thus A Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Joined 14 May 2010 Posted: 7 messages Test Date: 08/16/2011 Target GMAT Score: 760 dinaroneo wrote: IMO :A The conclusion is 'The only effective way.....' this ignores all other ways to curb pollution. Thus A Bang on! can you share how you come to figure out this assumption. Since, a prevailing problem has been discussed by giving a solution in the end as the main conclusion. how can we think of attacking the root cause of the problem ie removing the use of automobiles. I assumed when we read the argument we make certain core assumptions in which denying the use of automobile is one of them. We can think of many assumptions when discussing on an argument but while choosing a particular assumption in CR problem handling, we generally choose the relavant assumptins. Let me know if point is not being conveyed properly. Please share your reasoning. Thanks! Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Joined 26 Jun 2008 Posted: 67 messages Upvotes: 1 The key lies here: whenever in an argument there is a superlative qulalifier used (such as: best way, most effective way or the only way) that is we are told the given path is the only way to reach the goal, the underlying assumption is there can not be any onther way to reach the goal. (Reference: MGMAT, Chap 4, Page 60) Choose the answer which talks about any other way (being less efective- in this case) Regards! • Free Trial & Practice Exam BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5-Day Free Trial 5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Practice Test & Review How would you score if you took the GMAT Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • FREE GMAT Exam Know how you'd score today for$0

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

### Top First Responders*

1 Jay@ManhattanReview 67 first replies
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow 64 first replies
3 GMATGuruNY 44 first replies
4 Ian Stewart 23 first replies
5 Scott@TargetTestPrep 17 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

211 posts
2 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

94 posts
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

90 posts
4 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

69 posts
5 Jay@ManhattanReview

Manhattan Review

68 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts