- Bhavin@Magoosh
- Official Company Rep
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:00 pm
- Location: Berkeley, CA
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:13 members
- GMAT Score:750
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
RedeemLots of triangles
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
- PussInBoots
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:47 am
- Thanked: 3 times
-
bharathh
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:30 am
- Thanked: 19 times
Doh .. didn't read the question properly.
Ok then my answer is B
With Statement 1 you can prove that AD:DC = 1:2, but you need the value of AD to know for sure.
With statement 2 you can prove that BC is 1
Ok then my answer is B
With Statement 1 you can prove that AD:DC = 1:2, but you need the value of AD to know for sure.
With statement 2 you can prove that BC is 1
- Bhavin@Magoosh
- Official Company Rep
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:00 pm
- Location: Berkeley, CA
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:13 members
- GMAT Score:750
Good work! OA is B.
We know BDC is x (because side BC = BD)
Therefore DBC is 180-2x
Therefore DBA is 2x, making triangle ABD isosceles
Therefore side AD = side BD (and we know BD = BC)
So B is sufficient.
We know BDC is x (because side BC = BD)
Therefore DBC is 180-2x
Therefore DBA is 2x, making triangle ABD isosceles
Therefore side AD = side BD (and we know BD = BC)
So B is sufficient.
Bhavin Parikh
Magoosh Test Prep
Haas MBA 2010
Magoosh Test Prep
Haas MBA 2010