BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

looks easy but may be tough

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: looks easy but may be tough

by yezz » Tue Aug 18, 2009 5:40 pm
ern5231 wrote:Does the rectangle have an area less than 30?
(1) Perimeter = 20
(2) Diagonal < 10
OA given is A. But I feel it should be D. What do you say?
to maximize an area of a rectangle make it a square ( a square is a special type of rectangle which in turn is a special type of parallelogram.

from one

square(rectangle) parimeter = 20 thus side = 5

area of the square with side 5 = 25<30...suff

from 2

diagonal <10, worst case scenario is diagonal = 10

thus the 2 sides of the rectangle is 5, 5sqrt3

area = 2*5/2*5sqrt3 = 25sqrt3>30

however the diagonal can be = 4

area 2*4/2*4sqrt3 = 16sqrt3<30

thus insuff

A is the answer
Join the discussion

by varunkh70 » Tue Aug 18, 2009 9:51 pm
oh..I did not know this concept..Does the diagonal of a rectangle turn it into two 30-60-90 triangles?
Join the discussion

by PussInBoots » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:45 pm
Nope
Join the discussion

by sakurle » Thu Aug 20, 2009 7:11 am
Let us take statement 2.
Diagonal < 10, worse situation Diagonal = 10, in that case sum of 2 sides, a+b > 10, (sum of any 1 sides is always greater than 3rd)

In this case a+b can be 12, a=5, b=7 axb = 35. On other hand diaginal can be 5 in which case a+b > 5, and axb < 30 Therefore insuff.
Join the discussion

by navalpike » Thu Aug 20, 2009 8:08 am
I have never heard of this concept. How does simply providing the diagonal turn it into a 30 60 90?
Join the discussion

by sreak1089 » Thu Aug 20, 2009 8:12 am
but it does turn it into twp 45-45-90 triangles right?
varunkh70 wrote:oh..I did not know this concept..Does the diagonal of a rectangle turn it into two 30-60-90 triangles?
Join the discussion

by sakurle » Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:24 am
Nope it does not turn into 45-45-90 either. If you go by 2. then if diagonal < 10 worse case diagonal = 10; then a+b sum of 2 sides has to be greater than 10. Assuming 5, 7 the product is 35 > 30.

On the other hand if diagonal <5, the sides can be 3,4 where area <30. Therefore IMO insuff. Answer is A.
Join the discussion