- II
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:35 pm
- Location: London, UK
- Thanked: 19 times
- GMAT Score:680
See attached question from GMATPrep.
I am going through each of the answer choices trying to highlight what is wrong or right (for the correct choice) with the answer choices:
(A) Issue with original sentence:
• Idiom: “associated both” (incorrect) Vs “associated with” (correct)
• Distorts meaning of original sentence: “bear traits associated both with Homo erectus and, in addition, Homo sapiens has been found in the …”
• “has been found” – what has been found ? this looks as if it is referring to Homo Sapiens … in which case it should be “have been found”.
(B)
• Idiom: associated with should be used
• “have been found” – whats been found ? the skull. So this should be “has been found”.
(C)
• Correct use of idiom “associated with”
• “has been found” correctly refers to the “million year old skull”.
(D)
this sounds wrong to my ear ... but what grammatical rule is being broken here ?
(E)
• “have been found” should be “has been found”
dont understand what is wrong with "which indicates" ... why is "indicating" better than "which indicates" ? Is this a parallelism issue ---> bearing, indicating ?
Thanks for your input.
II
I am going through each of the answer choices trying to highlight what is wrong or right (for the correct choice) with the answer choices:
(A) Issue with original sentence:
• Idiom: “associated both” (incorrect) Vs “associated with” (correct)
• Distorts meaning of original sentence: “bear traits associated both with Homo erectus and, in addition, Homo sapiens has been found in the …”
• “has been found” – what has been found ? this looks as if it is referring to Homo Sapiens … in which case it should be “have been found”.
(B)
• Idiom: associated with should be used
• “have been found” – whats been found ? the skull. So this should be “has been found”.
(C)
• Correct use of idiom “associated with”
• “has been found” correctly refers to the “million year old skull”.
(D)
this sounds wrong to my ear ... but what grammatical rule is being broken here ?
(E)
• “have been found” should be “has been found”
dont understand what is wrong with "which indicates" ... why is "indicating" better than "which indicates" ? Is this a parallelism issue ---> bearing, indicating ?
Thanks for your input.
II
- Attachments
-

















